Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00030)

I thought this may be of interest to some of you skeptics or believers with 
reference to the theosophical truths. Hope you find it of some value, whatever 
your bent.:-)
Lenny 
_______________________________________

To: Mind and Brain conference (MindBrain@yahoogroups.com)
From: leonmaurer@aol.com

In a message dated 01/02/05 6:38:58 PM, Dr.d@delaSierra-Sheffer.net writes:

>The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
>Shortcut to: http://www.miskatonic.org/godel.html

Thank you for pointing out the proof that there is no way that any non 
provable truth can be proved. :-)

Therefore, I must assume and accept -- in lieu of any valid proof that 
consciousness is a function or epiphenomena of matter or brain complexity, or that 
matter does not arise as a temporary or constantly changing effect of pure 
energy out of a non changing emptiness (i.e., the non metric zero-point of 
absolute or fundamental Space itself) -- that the noumenal roots of both phenomenal 
consciousness and matter, as functionally but not independently separate, must 
be fundamental aspects of that zero-point. Also, if that starting point is 
the end point of a previous Universe -- presumedly, it must contain all the 
accumulated holographic informational and experiential memory of that previous 
universe. I also rest this presumption on the recently accepted theory (by 
Hawking among others) that information is not lost or irretrievable when energy 
spirals into a black hole and ends up in its "singularity"

Thus, I can only conclude that all that is, was, and potentially will be, 
both informational and phenomenal, must have originated in such a point or 
"singularity" prior to the "big bang" or initial appearance of all matter and 
consciousness in this finite universe -- which may be one of an infinite number of 
universes -- considering the infinite force and infinite intelligence that 
would necessarily rest in that infinitely divisible (and also expandable) source 
of everything. ("Things" being considered as that which can be existent as 
individual entities in themselves, in any space-time frame, extending from the 
subtlest universal fields, through the grossest fundamental particles, to the 
individual rays or "strings" of expressed zero-point energy.)

Accordingly, since matter in its ultimate resolution can be nothing more than 
that absolute space in motion, we must assume that both motion and awareness 
(which would also include will or intent) have their roots in that absolute 
zero-point (which can only be imagined as pure abstractions). It follows, that 
such abstract motion can also only be imagined as fundamental spin (I call it 
"spinergy") rotating at infinite degrees of potential velocity, on an infinite 
number of potential axes that contains, in toto, infinite potential angular 
momentum. In addition, it would appear that the information is carried as 
holographic interference patterns of such spin vibration. Consequently, these 
assumptions must be taken as axioms if any cogent theory of the origin, involution 
and evolution of consciousness, mind and matter can be deduced that will 
explain every phenomena in the known universe as a "Unified Field Theory of 
Everything" -- including consciousness -- since every field must have or pass 
through a zero-point of origination. 

Therefore, my theory of ABC -- hypothetically explaining the emanation of the 
primal universal fields at the first instant of their birth (the "big bang") 
out of the Absolute void, and their fractal involution in three iterations 
from near infinite frequency-energy to the finite frequency-energy of the metric 
space time continuum prior to the "breaking of symmetry" -- would appear to be 
the basis upon which all subsequent evolution rests. From this basis, 
coupled with the fundamental laws of cycles and periodicity or "electromagnetism," 
along with the coenergetic transfer of holistic information from field to field 
by inductive-resonance processes -- all subsequent physical, mental and 
conscious phenomena, both subjectively and objectively, can be deduced and 
explained mathematically and/or by linguistic logic. 

I might add that the premise of the ubiquity of the zero-point throughout all 
multidimensional spherical hyperspace fields, which includes the metric 
space, and all the coenergetic fields within it, is based on the fact that the 
space between the quantum particles (at the Planck level) must contain an infinite 
amount of zero-points -- since, while they are abstractly "spherical," they 
have no directional dimensions, and are therefore, contiguous wherever such 
Planck spaces exist -- which is everywhere. This, incidentally, could account for 
the non locality of consciousness, inertia, quantum entanglement, action at a 
distance, and other unexplainable anomalies of reductive science.

In conclusion, I have no doubts that when such deductions are made they will 
conform with all valid theories of physics analytically, mathematically, and 
experimentally arrived at by the reductive and inductive methods of 
conventional science. 

Referring to your previous query...

>>LeonM: "It's unfortunate that science can't get a handle on such perpetual
>>"abstract motion" circling around a stationary dimensionless point that 
can, 
>>at the same time be everywhere within any spatial metric... "
>
> In the absence of empirical evidence can you develop the arguments
>for its possible inferential existence even if you have to resort to modal
>logic. Dr.d'

...I hope the above hopefully modally logical argument makes sense.

Leon Maurer
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html 

-----Original Message------
In a message dated 01/01/05 5:20:34 PM, LeonMaurer writes:

>Perhaps, if we consider the dimensionless zero-point center around which
>a peripherally driven wheel rotates [added: in a free fall vacuum] 
>that transfers that rotational energy without loss 
>to the center point of the axle connected to it. Or we might
>envision a sine wave of vibrational energy that changes from positive to
>negative phase at the zero-point center of the cycle without any loss of
>momentum. e.g., As a mind experiment, if we reduce the wave to that center
>by reducing its phase time factor to zero, the only way that the energy
>can be conserved at that point would be in the form of pure spin of absolute
>empty space itself, or the analogous spin of whatever medium that energy
>might be traveling through. 
>
>Accordingly, In my theory of ABC, I envision that the first aspect of primal
>energy that surrounds, pervades, and supports this entire metric universe,
>impulsively emanates centrifugally, around one axis (as a dual force ray
>of opposite directional phase) out of a "singularity" or zero-point of
>absolute space containing infinite gyroscopic (G) force in the form of
>spin moment or "spinergy" rotating on an infinite number of axes. The
>assumption is that, since no force or energy can exist without some sort
>of movement, there cannot be any point in fundamental space that is not
>in absolute or abstract motion. By reduction, as we reach the absolute
>zero-point, this can only be in the abstract form of fundamental spin.
> What is spinning however, being empty of any spatial metric, and thus
>infinitesimal and beyond all space and time, must forever remain beyond
>the scope of human, i.e., finite intelligence to comprehend? (Although
>it's state of consciousness might be capable of being directly experienced
>in the highest state of transcendental awareness. e.g., the Samahdi of
>the Eastern yogi meditators.) Incidentally, this experience leaves us
>with the assumption that pure awareness, as well as will or intent, must
>be the inherent natures of the zero-point itself... With it's empowerment
>being the infinite inherent force and potential energy of its "spinergy."
>And, it's fndamental intelligence, being the interference patterns of 
information
>carried by the spinergy's vibrational waves.
>
>This initial positive and negative ray traveling simultaneously in opposite
>polar directions, due to its centripetal attraction to the point of 
origination,
>returns to the zero-point and ultimately in an endless three cycle spiral
>vortex loop following a Mobius or Gordian knot path, forms a circle of
>infinite diameter containing two inner circles of positive and negative
>energy. See: 
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html#anchor1341429
>(Incidentally, this diagram only shows the formation of the "light" or
>positive field of the first dual force.)
>
>Simultaneously, since the origin point is also spinning on two other 
perpendicular
>axes, the moving twin ray (spiraling around each other due to their inherent
>opposite spins) like the dual strings of the DNA molecule, weaves (or knits)
>three globular fields like twin bubbles within an outer bubble. As an
>analogy, we might imagine a singular ray of magnetic force surrounding
>the Earth, leaving in opposite directions from its North Pole and returning
>through its South Pole as an endless Mobius spiral vortex loop crossing
>through its center of gravity. As the Earth turns on its axis, this singular
>ray would form the entire homogeneous global field surrounding the Earth.
> 
>The inner bubbles, then, transferring their moment of force to their own
>zero-point centers, continue to involve fractally, until all the 14 lower
>order "coadunate but not consubstantial" fields that make up the primal
>universe, at the moment of the "big bang," are fully formed. The first
>seven upper fields representing the spiritual or noumenal nature of the
>universe and the lower seven representing its physical or phenomenal nature.
>See: http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
>http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
>
>Since time as well as this assemblage of initial force fields of descending
>orders of frequency energy are infinitely divisible, this first and second
>logos is completely formed in the first moment of phenomenal time -- which
>would be almost instantaneous relative to our time measurement frame. 
>
>Also, since there must be an intelligence behind the ultimate construction
>of the physical universe, we propose that consciousness (awareness, and
>will or intent) is a function of the zero-point itself, which is outside
>of all time and space, and that the intelligence or plan of evolution is
>carried as holographic interference patterns of vibration encoded between
>the twin rays of positive and negative G-Force -- which patterns were 
inherent
>in the initial "spinergy" of infinite potentiality as a result of previous
>universal experience in its former manifest state. 
>
>>From this, we can deduce all subsequent involution of the analogous fields
>of all noumenal forms in the primal Universe and their individual 
evolution's,
>through the formation of the galaxies, solar systems, planets, minerals,
>plants, animals, humans, etc., down to the fundamental particles that relate
>to quantum theories and the speculations of Supersting/M-brane theories
>that correlate relativity and quantum theory.
>
>Let me know if you think there are sufficient modally logical inferences
>in the above outline to justify the existence of the zero-point spinergy
>as the causal root of all coenergetic fields of universal mass-energies...
>And, incidentally, could it also justify the zero-point itself as the 
receptor
>and source of awareness and intent, along with the mind and memory existing
>as separate entities in coenergetic fields that are in different frequency
>phase orders of overall space-time than the brain-body and their EM fields
>exist in? 
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Leon Maurer
>http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics