Theos-Talk Archives (December 2004 Message tt00066)

Hello, Everyone.
 
I am Loreto and had been lurking reading, gleaning whatever" wisdom" there is that I can find in the discussions and putting things that don''t matterto me to the trash bin.
 
Unfortunately, Bart, kristar is right. Whatever wisdom it is that you trying to share with everyone (I hope you are; and not just simply ranting and raving about everything and almost everyone that you do not agree with) islost in all the ranting, raving and sanity-questioning of almost everyone that you don't agree with, that I see in your posts.
 
A situation that may be unlike Osho's but nevertheless, energetically, verymuch alike -- the negative outbalanced the positive (and I hope there are some that I probably missed).
 
So much so that I have decided, starting yesterday, to just direct to email Trash whatever comes from "Bart Lidofsky" <bartl@sprynet.com>".
 
Thanks; and bowing out for the moment.
 
Loreto

krishtar <krishtar_a@brturbo.com> wrote:

Bart 
As usual these exchange of roughness and harshness leads no nothing.
There is nothing anyone can say to those who don“t want to believe.

K



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bart Lidofsky 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World compassion thoughts on osho



krishtar wrote:
> Damn it! So it was you who wrote! (smile) If you have never read what
> he said, there is nothing I can say, but if you did you would not
> believe in any " convictions", for we know the tree by its fruits.

That's right. I judge Osho by his actions, and not just his writings.

> If one wants to know who HPB was and take the Peter Washington“s "The
> Mme. Blavatsky“s Baboon" or some excerpts from the SPR it is
> similar...one will think she was a liar and a fraud. 

Except that Peter Washington's work was not made available for peer 
review. In fact, most of his accusations about H. P. Blavatsky really 
were taking the statements of Alice Bailey, and attributing them to 
Blavatsky.

> government " of his "disciples" interests. The intoxication was real
> Bart, but remember that he used to be somebody who always talked
> openly the truth, whomever it might concern, no everybody appreciates
> it, and at that time there was much concern in making him a
> criminal. 

So, he didn't have sex with minors? They were all lying?

> simplified version in mind, the choice is yours. He never practised
> bioterrorism. Not him. That is what I believe and I had to say.

Here's an interesting article from one who knew him, and considered him 
to be a holy man:

http://home.att.net/~meditation/Osho.html

Bart




Yahoo! Groups Links










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]