Theos-Talk Archives (November 2004 Message tt00309)

Regina St Clare wrote:
<<On Imagination... Would it be that 
pure imagination, that which reflects 
our divine nature, would be the 
objective to manifest-- >>>

Per whatever interpretive/karmic 
tendency ...

<<thus what we experience in samadhi, 
which may be visual or not, would 
manifest in our life, as lived.>>

Per whatever interpretive/karmic 
tendency ...

<<Do we not return from meditation with 
a heightened awareness and perception 
which could be named harmonious, clear, 
etc. And when we stay in that space, we 
are continually informed by IT, as in 
living wisely.>>

Per whatever interpretive/karmic 
tendency ...

<<What pollutes imagination is anything 
but the pure divine essence and if we 
focus sufficiently we can ue the focus 
of the mind to penetrate the samskaras 
and free the energy for use by the 
divine intervention that we direct.>>

Per whatever interpretive/karmic t 
endency ...

I think I might be trying to say here 
that anything short of Beness is karmic, 
interpretive, mayavic, (according to 
Mahayana Buddhism, I think). Not that 
lots of things aren't seen as helpful, 
obviously enough. And, for all I know, 
there might be many reasons why one 
might find a "much better" w/Whatever 
between here and Beness, so ... I don't 
even seem to have experienced samadhi, 
so what can I say ...

Speculatively,
Mauri