Theos-Talk Archives (September 2004 Message tt00035)

Hallo Dallas and all,

My views are:

I take it, that you have answered my email with just
some other questions.

And have somewhat ignored the following view from my previous email:
"Since Theosophy is wisdom teaching, it must be perfectly true, that a -
great number of books and similar material - not containing literally the
(dead-letter) words "theosophy" or "theosophical" in them ALSO are valid
theosophical books and material.
And are there any theosophical book which does NOT have any fault in them?
Which ones have not?"



M. Sufilight

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net>
To: "AA-BNStudy" <study@blavatsky.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:36 AM
Subject: Theos-World RE: Pedro again on "ORIGINAL TEACHINGS"


> Sept 1 2004
>
> What is Theosophy?
>
>
> Here are a few considerations:
>
> 1
> If you wish to trace the descent of the record of the WISDOM RELIGION from
> past eras, go to the great texts of those religions and philosophies, that
> cherish and enshrine them. However remember that all translations carry
the
> bias of the translator - and to that extent they are "opinionated." By
> consulting a number of translations some of these biases are removed. The
> final decision and choice is always out own.
>
> 2
> For THEOSOPHY; Go to the original writings of HPB and the Masters. Read
> and study that. Then you will at least be sure what the original teachers
> for this era said.
>
> 3
> If you want a diversity of views not necessarily THEOSOPHICAL, then read
> other books.
>
> 4
> If you want opinions about THEOSOPHY, then consult other writers, but DO
NOT
> call those opinion that they offer: "THEOSOPHY."
>
>
> It is said that THEOSOPHY has no two answers to any question.
>
>
> If one gets different or conflicting answers, whom to trust?
>
>
> Who is trying to impress who? And Why?
>
>
> How much can we rely on our own common sense, intuition and power of
thought
> and capacity to be strictly and impartially logical?
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dallas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morten N. Olesen [mailto:global-theosophy@adslhome.dk]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:59 AM
> To: Theosophy Study List
> Subject: Re: Pedro again on "ORIGINAL TEACHINGS"
>
> Hallo Dallas and all,
>
> My views are:
>
> Since Theosophy is wisdom teaching, it must be perfectly true, that a -
> great number of books and similar material - not containing literally the
> (dead-letter) words "theosophy" or "theosophical" in them ALSO are valid
> theosophical books and material.
> And are there any theosophical book which does NOT have any fault in them?
> Which ones have not?
>
> So would it then be allright to have for instance
> - Mein Kampf on the shelves?
> - The New Testament?
> - The Quran?
> - Books by A. Crowley ?
> - Books on how to build various weapons?
> - Only 1st editions by Leadbeater?
>
> ---
> And was and is the Original teachings always the right ones?
> Is a 2nd edition not sometimes the best?
> ---
> The question is where do we draw the line?
> And Who draws the line?
> Who makes the priorities of which books are put on the shelves? (The buyer
> or the seller?)
> And what line are being drawn by the majority of teachers - locally,
> regionally or more globally?
> And would this line not be different from group to group?
>
> And is this not exactly the dilemma theosophy as the wisdom teachings as
> such faces today, because there are so many branches of Theosophy?
> ---
>
> The key is, that we can go on dicussing this line and where to draw it,
and
> under which circumstances.
> Some will learn something by it, and some will find such debates
disgusting
> and a time waste. Others have different work to make a priority.
>
> But a recent post from you said, that the teaching should promote altruism
> and not psychic cravings. And I agree.
>
> ---
>
> The next story by Mulla Nasrudin and the Professor might be helpful.
>
>
> from
> M. Sufilight
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net>
> To: "Theosophy Study List" <theos-l@list.vnet.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Pedro again on "ORIGINAL TEACHINGS"
>
>
> Sept 1 2004
>
> Dear M and Friends:
>
> As far as I can see:
>
> No reading or study is forbidden in THEOSOPHY -- but if in the experience
of
> a student something ought to receive a caution, then it is given on that
> basis -- as a friendly warning. No prohibitions are needed. Karma takes
> care of all decisions anyone makes.
>
> As to teachers. At present there are only student/teachers. We all
study,
> and as inquiries arise, they pass along the information they have obtained
> by study from the "original Teachings of THEOSOPHY," or other sources.
>
> Everything has to be independently considered by the readers and
> questioners. It is the basic principles that need to be known and
applied.
> (see below)
>
> I find that the knowledge of those "original Teachings" is slowly
> increasing. That is a good sign for the continuity of THEOSOPHY
>
> There are no "leaders or teachers" who can give definitive answers to
> problems. There are fellow students that can respond with leads for the
> enquirer to use for his further study.
>
> But having studied the writings of the Teachers (HPB and the Masters) of
> this time and era, some writers can provide references, quotations and
basic
> concepts which enable enquirers to work out their own solutions.
>
> The questions asked below, have to be answered by each student
> independently -- their own common sense and sense of logic assist.
>
> There is no "dead letter" or "literalism," and no "authorities" other than
> ourselves, as we compare what we study with what we know.
>
> The "Original teachings of THEOSOPHY" have to be treated as "guides."
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dallas
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> Some basics:
>
>
> 3 FUNDAMENTALS
>
> 1 SPACE is everywhere, and cannot be measured. It is the
UNIVERSE.
>
> 2. LAW is everywhere. It is always honest, true, fair, universal
> and impersonal. It has many aspects and all are framed so as to support
life
> everywhere.
>
> 3. The EVOLUTION of all creatures and beings (including Mankind)
> starts from the same single Spiritual Basis. It makes them all "brothers"
in
> fact, though their forms and beliefs may differ. Each follows his or her
own
> self-made path. In the end there is a Goal: it has been called SUPREME
> PERFECTION -- also, ALL KNOWINGNESS (or WISDOM).
>
> Even the material of all forms ( atoms, molecules, cells, etc. ) are
> immortals and come from the same one SOURCE: SPIRIT.
>
>
> 4 MAJOR BASIC IDEAS:
>
>
> HERMES taught: "A stone becomes a plant. A plant becomes an animal, An
> animal becomes a Man ( a THINKER), and, a Thinker becomes a
> GOD. Never is anything made less or lowered again." [The word "God" used
> here means a Thinker who can understand everything in the Universe - a
> Prophet or a Wise Man - is a "Son of 'God.'" Basically we ae all sons and
> daughters of God -- the ONE UNIVERSAL SPIRIT -- ATMAN.
>
> All progress is forward and upward and eventually we learn and know
> everything.
>
>
> 1. REINCARNATION is the process by which all beings advance. The
> forms constantly change. The Spirit that is within and behind the forms
we
> wear, and creates them, it NEVER DIES. We do NOT "die."
>
> 2. Sleep is death. Death is sleep. The CONSCIOUSNESS of each
> individual always survives. The fear of "death" is abolished.
>
> 3. The Law Of Spiritual Development is through BROTHERHOOD. It is
> mutual help and is always cooperative. It views Humanity and all beings
as
> a single family. Wisdom is the ability to understand law operating
> everywhere in a moral and altruistic fashion
>
> 4. MAN'S (a Thinker) DUTY is to help all others.
>
>
> Added all together, these are 7 of the principal points of Theosophical
and
> universal science, and in all true philosophies.
>
> Think about them. Try to see if they are true. Ask all the questions you
> want.
>
> If you wish to study Theosophical propositions in greater detail, I
suggest
> you start with a simple text book like
>
> The KEY TO THEOSOPHY (by H P B) (an Introduction to Theosophical
> doctrines and the ethics of Theosophy to be applied - 300 pages), or
>
> Mr. Judge's The OCEAN OF THEOSOPHY, ( a summary of The SECRET
> DOCTRINE -- which is a book that covers the history of Cosmic evolution
and
> that of our Earth and humanity - as a host of spiritual beings all working
> and living together for millions of years - 180 pages).
>
> These are available for downloading from http://www.blavatsky.net and
> http://www.ult-la.org .
>
> ==============================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morten
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 4:28 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Pedro on "ORIGINAL TEACHINGS"
>
> Hallo all,
>
> My views are:
>
> May I drop a few words...?
>
> The following always comes to my mind, when someone almost says, that one
> shouldn't read certain books.
>
> The Key to theosophy, section 2:
>
> "We cull the good we find in each". I.e. each teaching system or thought
> system.
>
> A vital issue is the present day teachers within the various theosophical
> groups.
>
> The only thing I will say is: You shall know them on their fruits.
>
> Do they support theosophical teaching or do they just say, that they do
so?
>
> Do they enhance the teaching or is it just old business as usual teaching?
>
> Do they promote a main teaching which is misleading - theosophically
> speaking?
>
> Is their teaching something you just as well could have read in a book
> yourselves?
>
> Do they teach each person in a group individually? If not what are the
> concequences of this?
>
> -------
>
> Let us remember, that the theosophical teachings always adapts themselves
to
> time, place, people and circumstances.
>
> It is not the dead-letter of the teacher which are important, but the
fruits
> the teacher creates by the teaching.
>
> The seekers suffers often from problems related to egotism. This the
> teachers has to relate to.
>
> CUT
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to theos-l as: global-theosophy@adslhome.dk
> List URL - http://list.vnet.net/?enter=theos-l
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-theos-l-56348C@list.vnet.net
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to theos-l as: dalval14@earthlink.net
> List URL - http://list.vnet.net/?enter=theos-l
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-theos-l-56348C@list.vnet.net
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>