Theos-Talk Archives (August 2004 Message tt00483)

Frank, you wrote:

=====================================================

Daniel, I justed the book as a current example of 
the degenerated, low spiritual and intellectual 
condition of the Theosophical Movement.
I was really angry when I read it. So many errors!

If one reads the foreword one has no problem to 
dedice which of the two natures - the individuality 
or the personality - was leading the pen.
And this childish behavior to belittle other 
reseachers!

=====================================================

Thanks for your comments but I am wondering
if you will expland on what you mean by:

"So many errors!" 

Can you give a few examples??

And why is it a "current example"
of the "degenerated, low spiritual and intellectual 
condition of the Theosophical Movement"?

Those are quite harsh words. Can you give
us some examples to show readers how you
are assessing this book?

And if you had been the editor, how would
you have made it different?

Also please tell us what in the forword
made you write:

"... this childish behavior to belittle other 
reseachers!"

Thanks.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc