[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Aug 09, 2004 04:44 AM
by Katinka Hesselink
Interesting quote. Sure seems to suggest what you say it does. The Mahatma Letters make it pretty clear HPB was one of a kind, and according to The Key to Theosophy Only at the end of the 20th century would her equal come... Katinka --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, samblo@c... wrote: > Katinka, Daniel and all, > In reading the thread discussions in regard to Leadbeater and the LCC i > had gone to the posted URL for the LCC and read the Article which was indicated > by the poster of same, but I also have then read several of the others listed > on the Home page of the LCC. One of them: > > > > http://liberalcatholic.org/Pub/CWL_Textbook_of_theosophy.asp > > > > "A Textbook of Theosophy" Leadbeater 1912, makes the following unique > characterization: > > > > "One of these apprentices was Helena Petrovna Blavatsky â€" a great soul who > was sent out to offer knowledge to the world some forty years ago." > > ( Chapter II, para 17) > > > > This rather singular usage in terming Madam Blavatsky as an "apprentice" with > a small "a" caught my mind and I wondered if this reflected an overtly > intentional desire to diminish the Prior Agent of Theosophy, H.P.B. in the eyes of > the then current readers in 1912? I wonder what the Mahatma's might have had as > a response to this characterization in light that they Letters made reference > to Blavatsky having been a Developed Adept that had residency as H.P.B. ? > > > > John > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]