Some Implications of Bart's Contention that the occult phenomena were faked
Jun 30, 2004 10:50 PM
by Daniel H. Caldwell
In several of my recent posts, I have given explanations
by both HPB and Mahatma KH on the rationale of the
precipitation process. Note well that in giving
their explanations that HPB and the Mahatma have
brought a number of the teachings of Theosophy into
the discussion.
Now let us take a look at the implications of Bart's
assertion that the occult phenomena were faked.
Not only is HPB guilty of faking the phenomena
but ALSO of lying about the origin of the phenomena
and using some of the Theosophical teachings to
explain the fake phenomena.
The same with KH. The Master is guilty of lying
about the phenomena and actually making up
part of the teaching concerning the Akasa and what
adepts can actually do.
And one wonders if Bart believes that there
was really a Master KH or if he suspects that
HPB also faked the Mahatma.
If Bart's original contention of fakery is true,
it implies that some of the teachings as given
in HPB's own writings may also be "faked" or
"made up".
Some food for thought.
Daniel Caldwell
http://hpb.cc
http://theosophy.info
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
