theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Bart has simply proven my original point

Jun 20, 2004 09:01 PM
by Bart Lidofsky


Daniel H. Caldwell wrote:
"The rule of 'Give Evidence' is not be be violated. . . .No matter how possible or plausible the author's conjecture [at step 2 in the 4 step process] it cannot be accepted as truth [at step 4] if he has only his hunch [which is not evidence] to support it. Truth rests not on possibility or plausibility but on probability. Probability means the balance of chances that, given such and such evidence [at step 3], the event it records happened in a certain way; or, in other cases, that a supposed event did not in fact take place."
OK, what happened to the dirt? If a cup was materialized in hard ground, then dirt had to be displaced. Unless you are saying that Blavatsky also dematerialized the dirt.

If Blavatsky could materialize a teacup, why didn't she just do it in full view of everybody?

Bart





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application