Theos-Talk Archives (May 2004 Message tt00229)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:


> The "Absolute Reality" being entirely outside of that manifest 
multi-spatial 
> unity, as well as beyond the direct correspondence between all 
things in it, 
> both visible and invisible. 


> When we separate the infinite, unchanging Absolute from the finite, 
ever 
> changing Cosmos -- there are two "realities" to consider. The 
former cannot be 
> categorized, but the latter can. 


> As I said before, it's important to keep our categories separate in 
mind in 
> any discourse... 


Your posting is a clear example of theosophical theology: dualistic, 
categorical and authoritarian. You are not "discussing" anything; you 
are presenting a crystallized and dogmatic view, in spite of your 
more than forty years of study of Theosophy.


> Incidentally, anyone who doesn't need those two categories of 
proof, whether 
> subjective or objective, can be only a blind believer or 
disbeliever based on 
> "testimony" or "authority " -- who can never be a true occultist or 
completely 
> "enlightened" with respect to the nature of ALL Reality (both 
Absolute and 
> Relative).
> 
> Leon 


But I must thank you for reminding me that I am not enlightened and 
that I will never be an occultist. You have helped me to remind 
myself that all I really want is to study Theosophy with an 
unburdened mind.

Pedro