Theos-Talk Archives (May 2004 Message tt00048)

In a message dated 05/04/04 11:58:35 AM, netemara888@yahoo.com writes:

(snip -- see below)

>I believe that knowledge is universal being held for humanity in the 
>form of light waves or strings and that the plant kingdom (according 
>to AAB) is also the holder of the akhasic records.

Then (unless she is being misinterpreted) AAB (who was parroting Leadbeater) 
didn't know what the Akasha really is, or has it all mixed up (like almost 
everything else they said about the true nature of reality as given out by HPB) 
-- since the Akashic record is everywhere that any matter (visible or 
invisible) is, but is not any part of that matter. 

Although, we could say that the plant kingdom is a "holder" of the Akashic 
records in a partial sense -- since, in essence the Akasha and its record is 
also wherever the genetic model is encoded within every zero-point of manifest 
geometric space... Although, this genetic "knowledge" or informational coding 
for different forms of life can only be expressed through the progressive 
degrees of evolutionary organization of the DNA molecules (and their coenergetic 
field configurations) -- that are the basis of all organic or inorganic "life" 
(or potential consciousness) in all kingdoms of manifest nature from mineral, 
through plant, to mankind (and, of course, "Angels" or Chohans :-). 

Therefore, the "strings" of primal energy that manifests in all those 
kingdoms of nature, are "Maya" and only temporary, since "light waves" appear only in 
the worlds of cosmic substance or multidimensional space... While the Akashic 
record is encoded in the eternal circling of the non dimensional zero-point 
instant spin momentum or "spinergy" surrounding the zero-point of primal space 
("THE ETERNAL PARENT (Space), WRAPPED IN HER EVER INVISIBLE ROBES") -- that is 
"everywhere" beyond, yet within, all manifest (multi dimensional) space and 
time. 

Strings, as Mayavic emanations, can only decay as the Universe ages, but the 
information they carry as vibrational patterns of manifest force or 
mass-energy, when not dissipated or contradicted by counter intelligence on the higher 
Buddhi-Manas planes, transfers (coenergetically) from and to the different 
levels of pure circular spin in the non manifest Akashic realm -- that continues 
through infinite duration, from Manvantara to Manvantara, without change or 
diminishment. This Akasha, then, holds on its wings, so to speak, the eternal 
record of all relative changes experienced on the manifest planes. Thus Krishna, 
representing the rootless root of the Akasha, can say, "I established this 
whole universe with a single portion of myself, and remain separate 
(undiminished)." This is the fundamental basis of relativity as well as quantum 
divisibility. 

Incidentally, Einstein could have considered all this, but no previous 
scientific knowledge based on Newtonian laws of mechanics he learned as a physicist 
could anticipate it -- as Richard Feynman pointed out. (see: 
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/einstein.html) 
Therefore, his E=mc^2 as well as his concept of relativity with respect to 
inertia was a pure intuitive insight that could only have come about from his 
study of the previous esoteric metaphysics exposed fully for the first time to 
the West in the Secret Doctrine (a book we have heard was probably given to him 
by his friend Robert Millikan, a Mason and theosophist, several years before 
he wrote his first paper on special relativity in 1905). Once he had that 
equivalency relationship between mass and energy "modulated by the velocity of 
light in the vacuum, which is a function of both frequency and time (implied if 
not explained thoroughly in the SD) along with the concept of "elements" as 
individual quanta (also presaged in the SD) -- he had to invent the tensor 
(vector) mathematics that defined the 4-dimensionally curved space-time continuum 
that led to the general theory of relativity. Unfortunately, stymied by the 
discrepancies between relativity and quantum physics, he never considered 
vibrating "strings" as the intermediary between the quantum particle and the 
zero-point spinergy (or Akasha) and, therefore, failed in his quest to formulate a 
unified field theory -- which today's Superstring/M-brane theory has almost 
achieved. (The only thing still left out is the final link to consciousness or 
perception -- that, if they know where to look, is also thoroughly covered in 
the SD.:-) See: http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics 

Thus, the Akashic record has nothing directly to do with the "strings" of 
manifest light or primal energy -- other than endowing them with the information 
that causes their vibrational patterns to take on the various forms of 
fundamental particles -- the forces of which ultimately correlate and evolve into the 
atomic, molecular, and subsequent organic forms of nature (also "informed" by 
the "Akashic record," or primal, pre Cosmic intelligence).

Leonardo


--------------------Original message-----------

>--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "stevestubbs" <stevestubbs@y... wrote:
>
>> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" <netemara888@y... 
>> wrote:
>> > I am not a scholar of Einstein but I did read that huge biography 
>> > about him and the thing that gives credence to his beininfluenced 
>> > or impressed by something outside of himself is that he came up
>> > with the theory of special relativity purely by putting himself in the 
>> > place in his mental dimension.
>> 
>> You are right that this is a commonly received story. It is easily 
>> shown, however, that many of the ideas in Einstein's theory were 
>> already known before he wrote his first paper and that he synthesized 
>> them into something which came to more than the sum of its parts. 
>>So the story that he merely visualized himself in an elevator car in 
>> outer space does not tell the whole story.
>
>Steve,
>
>That's exactly right. And what we all need to remember is that 
>physicists nor other scientists work in a vacuum. I am working or 
>rather rewriting what I started some time ago. In it I hope to show 
>why there is no such thing as an unthought thought or a new concept. 
>People choose knowledge probably according to the vibrations that 
>come to them that are similar. People always say that they are on the 
>same wavelength. In fact this could be a fact. That we operate by 
>registering wavelengths or string vibrations. 
>
>I believe that knowledge is universal being held for humanity in the 
>form of light waves or strings and that the plant kingdom (according 
>to AAB) is also the holder of the akhasic records.
>
>Netemara