Theos-Talk Archives (April 2004 Message tt00694)

Friends,

Here's some more scientific approaches toward confirmation of theosophical 
metaphysics. 

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=1&articleID=00042F0D-1A0E-
1085-94F483414B7F0000 {See intro below}

They still overshoot the mark, however. The missing link is that, because of 
conventional science's inbred materialism, they start with the plane (brane) 
or line (string) and forget the essential circular spin momentum (spinergy) of 
the zero-point that contains the holographic information for the evolutionary 
construction of the entire Universe -- empowered, upon each awakening, by the 
intent (will) and consciousness (awareness) of the empty zero-point itself. 
Unfortunately, all their scenarios trying to explain the transition of 
the physical universe from a prior state of opposite condition or rest depends 
upon chance and probabilities rather than involution (during initial inflation) 
based on fundamental laws of cycles and periodicity, governed by initial 
spinergy, and guided by conscious will.
At least, however, science has begun to acknowledge that the universe 
preexisted before the big-bang and that time is eternal. Could we infer from 
that; The universe "reincarnates" periodically? If so, what does that say to the 
materialists about the possibility of human reincarnation, or that mind 
guided by spirit or consciousness, can control matter -- especially when, at the 
beginning (prior to emanation) consciousness and will was all that was?
Best Wishes, Lenny



April 27, 2004
FEATURE ARTICLES - Scientific American 
May 2004 issue 

COSMOLOGY 

The Myth of the Beginning of Time
String theory suggests that the big bang was not the origin of the universe 
but simply the outcome of a preexisting state 
By Gabriele Veneziano
Image: ALFRED T. KAMAJIAN
Sidebar: Overview/String Cosmology
Was the big bang really the beginning of time? Or did the universe exist 
before then? Such a question seemed almost blasphemous only a decade ago. Most 
cosmologists insisted that it simply made no sense--that to contemplate a time 
before the big bang was like asking for directions to a place north of the North 
Pole. But developments in theoretical physics, especially the rise of string 
theory, have changed their perspective. The pre-bang universe has become the 
latest frontier of cosmology. 
The new willingness to consider what might have happened before the bang 
is the latest swing of an intellectual pendulum that has rocked back and 
forth for millennia. In one form or another, the issue of the ultimate beginning 
has engaged philosophers and theologians in nearly every culture. It is 
entwined with a grand set of concerns, one famously encapsulated in an 1897 painting 
by Paul Gauguin: D'ou venons-nous? Que sommes-nous? Ou allons-nous? "Where do 
we come from? What are we? Where are we going?" The piece depicts the cycle of 
birth, life and death--origin, identity and destiny for each individual--and 
these personal concerns connect directly to cosmic ones. We can trace our 
lineage back through the generations, back through our animal ancestors, to early 
forms of life and protolife, to the elements synthesized in the primordial 
universe, to the amorphous energy deposited in space before that. Does our family 
tree extend forever backward? Or do its roots terminate? Is the cosmos as 
impermanent as we are? 
(Continued on web site)