Theos-Talk Archives (April 2004 Message tt00257)

Steve,
 
Thanks for your recent comments concerning your opinion
of Col. Olcott's testimony on the Masters.
 
I want to pursue some of the implications underlying
your opinion in a future email, but in the meantime, I have 
updated a number of documents that are RELEVANT to those
implications.
 
I give the URLs below:
 
• "I view M[orya] as a composite character...."
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonmcomposite.htm
 
• Chart Showing Interpretations of Some of Henry S. Olcott's Encounters with the Masters
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/masterschart.htm

 
• Henry S. Olcott's Testimony: Nine Accounts of Meeting Masters and Adepts
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/olcottaccounts.htm
 
• A Closer Look at Some of K. Paul Johnson's Arguments Concerning H.S. Olcott's Testimony about the Masters
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm
 
• ". . . why should one expect Olcott to be any more consistent and reliable [than Blavatsky]? . . . ."
http://www.blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm#III
 
Daniel
http://hpb.cc
http://theosophy.info
 
 

 
 
 
 

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]