Theos-Talk Archives (April 2004 Message tt00231)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@e...> 
wrote:
> March 7th 2004
> 
> Dear Friend:
> 

Hallo Dallis, I hope I can make it clear ;

The 7 principles; right, but I also learned that the whole spinnery 
from upside down will be
One Ultimate or Ultra atom combines with 7 principles its level 
completed goes farther with a new aspect from all of that; even in 7 
principles with the link to the other level within the Ultra Atom.
So the way down till we are now ,humans on earth; 

We have to go back(in consciousness) to the higher levels and from 
earth to another planet(Nw Jupiter) and then, evolutionairy as 
angels, archangels( on the planet Nw Venus after) and so on Vulcanus 
and after that the Manvantara will be finished .At least for the 
human beings.
Continiously to create within the seven principles and then to 
combine with the Ultra atom or spirit( maybe you call that the 
zeropoint) to go over in a next level>

That is what I learned in my first lessons on theosophy.
I think it is great to know that.
And in that greatness we need to help and to give others the insight 
in that truth.

What do you think the Insight and Intuitive Buddhi light comes from?
That comes to us( because we came out of it) to bring the whole 
family , also that principles are doing ,up to the higher level(s)

so we all are in the lift (upgrowing).Animals,humans all of them.

Christina.












> This short article will explain the reason I mentioned 6 "aspects" 
and 1
> central PRINCIPLE.
> 
> ===================================
> 
> 
> THE SEVENFOLD DIVISION
> 
> WHY NOT CHANGE THE DESIGNATION?
> 
> MR. Sinnett's book Esoteric Buddhism has done a great deal towards
> bringing before the West the Eastern philosophy regarding man and 
his
> constitution, but it has also served to perpetuate the use of a word
> that is misleading and incorrect. 
> 
> In that work on p. 61 he states, "Seven distinct principles are
> recognized by Esoteric Science as entering into the constitution of
> man," and then gives his scheme of division thus, The body, 
Vitality,
> Astral Body, Animal Soul, Human Soul, Spiritual Soul, and seventh,
> Spirit or Atma. 
> 
> Now if Spirit be, as the whole philosophy declares, in all and 
through
> all, it is erroneous to call it one of the series. This very early 
led
> to the accusation that we believed in seven distinct spirits in 
man. It
> always leads to misconception, and directly tends to preventing our
> understanding fully that the Atma includes, and is the substratum 
of,
> all the others. 
> 
> In India it caused a protracted and, at times, heated discussion 
between
> the adherents of the rigid seven-fold classification of Esoteric
> Buddhism and several learned and unlearned Hindus who supported a
> four-fold or five-fold division. [S D I 157-8] 
> 
> During that debate the chief Hindu controverter [ Mr. Subba Row], 
while
> holding to a different system, admitted the existence of "a real
> esoteric seven-fold classification," which of course cannot be 
given to
> the public. Mr. Sinnett also evidently made a mistake when he said 
that
> the first mentioned division is the esoteric one.
> 
> Now it would seem that many of these misconceptions and differences
> could be prevented if a word were adopted and invariably used that 
would
> clearly express the idea intended to be conveyed. As the prime
> declaration of theosophy is that all these so-called bodies and
> appearances are for the purpose of enabling the ONE--the Atma--to 
fully
> comprehend nature and "bring about the aim of the soul," why not
> denominate all that it uses for that purpose as vehicles? 
> 
> This name is strictly in accord with all parts of the philosophy. 
It is
> in effect the same as Upadhi, or basis, foundation, carrier. By its 
use
> we make no error when we say that theosophy declares there is Atma,
> which works with and through six vehicles. Strictly, the body is a
> vehicle for the astral body, it for the next, and so on up to Atma,
> which is therefore seen to be all and in all, as is clearly 
declared in
> Bhagavad-Gita.
> 
> This change, or to some other than "principles," should be adopted 
by
> all theosophists, for every day there is more inquiry by new minds, 
and
> theosophists themselves, indeed, need to use their words with care 
when
> dealing with such subjects. 
> 
> Or if greater clearness is desired, let us say that there is one
> principle which acts through six vehicles. The scheme will then 
stand
> thus:
> 
> Atma (spirit), one principle, indivisible
> 
> Its vehicles are:
> 
> 
Buddhi................................................................
..
> ...........	Spiritual Soul
> 
> 
Manas.................................................................
..
> ..........	Human Soul
> Kama
> 
Rupa..................................................................
..
> .	Animal Soul
> Linga
> 
Sharira...............................................................
..
> Astral Body
> Prana or
> 
Jiva.................................................................
> Vitality
> 
> 
Rupa..................................................................
..
> ............	The Body
> 
> Names have power, and if we go on talking of 7 principles when in 
truth
> there is but one, we are continually clouding our conception of
> theosophic truth.
> 
> EUSEBIO URBAN
> 
> Path, April, 1890
> 
> ===============================
> 
> Best washes,
> 
> Dallas
> 
> =================================
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chris
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:08 AM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: Multiperpectivalists Unite!
> 
> -Hi Dallas,
> 
> In your vision and the offer you brought over The 
Mysterious "Moment of
> Choice at mid-round"
> 
> The 7 truths maybe I miss something but I read there 6 in
> total and why from 1-3 and 8 - 10 ?
> 
> 
> CUT