Theos-Talk Archives (April 2004 Message tt00013)

Paul wrote partly: <<Kinda like 
"salvation" with Christians, who have 
argued for centuries about who has it,
with little serious examination of what 
it is exactly and what evidence they 
have for believing in it. Paul>>>

Seems to me that in the context of 
"serious examinations" re who, how, when 
re such as "Masters" and esotericy 
topics in general there might tend to
be (as you might know, Paul ...) various 
opinions going around out there about 
how such "serious examinations" should 
be defined, (or "more-specifically 
defnined," say ...) to begin with. How 
would I defnine "serious examinations"? 
The short answer is: speculatively 
(which might not say much, but I seem to 
have found out that, on these lists, 
interpretations tend to be all over the 
map regardless of what is said, or how 
it's said, by whoever, apparently, often 
times). But if all those interpretations 
make one "think," at least ... Then 
again if I knew how "think" "should be 
defnined" in various contexts maybe I 
wouldn't be speculating in the first place.

^:-/ ...
Mauri