Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00750)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:

> My view seems to be just as solid as yours.

I haven't seen any solid views from you about any issue so far. Is it 
because you disguise them with endless quotations from your own 
previous postings? We need much more objectivity and conciseness from 
you in order to have a meaningful discussion.


> I would like som more documentation than Mary Lutyens can give - 
and the
> loose remarks about dependence upon the possible Avatar.

Do your own research.


> So are you saying, that Bhagavad Gita is rubbish ?

A brilliant example of your fuzzy logic. Who mentioned the Gita, who 
mentioned the "Avatar"? But since you mentioned it, the teaching of 
the Gita strongly encourages non-dependence, for Krishna is not an 
external guru, but the deepest Self, Atma, in everyone:

"Thy business is with the action only, never with its fruits; so let 
not the fruit of action be thy motive, nor be thou to inaction 
attached." (II.47)

Pedro