Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00550)

Hello Morton,
My replies after yours below:

Morten Nymann Olesen wrote:

>1. Let me say this. If you, (Jerry Hejka-Ekins) cannot afford the time to read emails, - then please immediately stop reading this email. And stay away from timewasting emails.I hate to encourage people to do something, which their conscience tell them is wrong.
>
I'm busy. However, if I can be of help, I will. If not, I will tell you.

>3. I know, that you cannot speak on HPB's behalf.
>But you can think or contemplate!
>
First of all, the TS was a very different organization during HPB's 
time from what it became under Annie Besant. I might also add that, 
HPB, when dealing with people in public, always focused on the issues: 
never the person.

>4. It is allright, that you are an historian. But being morally ignorant is no good - although sometimes - pleasant.
>Please recoinsider your own position.
>
Are you saying that I am morally ignorant?

>5. Jerry wrote in the below:..."but my experience has been that it is futile to attempt to "prove" anything to anyone who is already vested in a contrary point of view. "
> 
>
>My question is: Who said I had a vested interest in all this ?
>
Sometimes what people don't say speak louder than what they do say. 
Look, I posted my opinion on this matter years ago. You sought me out 
and demanded that I "prooove it." Sounds like you have a vested 
interest to me. 

>- I am independant of any theosophical organization. -
>
So am I. 

>I just said, what my views and knowledge was when comparing Bailey's books
>with the CWL and Besant papers I knew about.
>
And I also shared my views on what I have read.

>If all the ES papers from back then in 1910-18 are online or have been published in various books written by Besant or CWL,then I see a lot of diffeence in the views expressed between Bailey's books and the so-called ES papers! I have not read all letters made by Besant and CWL, and because of that I am interested in any new views, which could throw a light upon this issue - Bailey's teachings as been "DRAWN DRIECTLY" from ES papers made by CWL or Besant.
>
You are entitled to your views, and I am entitled to mine. What else 
do you require of me?

>7. I have just reread the online version of - C. Jinarajadasa's book: Occult
>Investigations It didn't throw of anything substantial.
>
Jinarajadasa, in this book, identifies the ES teachings, the dates, 
places and circumstances of these revelations, sources they were 
supposed to have come, and in what journals and books they were made 
public and when. If you don't consider this "substantial" information 
from which to begin your investigation, then I'm afraid that I don't 
know how to help you. 

--jhe



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]