Re: re Steve S's" ancient documents" re JC/MM etc
Mar 19, 2004 11:56 AM
by stevestubbs
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Mauri <mhart@i...> wrote:
> I'm tending to wonder where one might
> find such "ancient documents," in that,
> even if they (or whatever "more-original
> versions," say) are purposely hidden and
> guarded (if so), one might wonder about
> the nature of the info/sources that
> refer to such "ancient documents"...
That comments makes me wonder about the nature of my querent.
Translations of the apostolic fathers and ante-nicene fathers can be
found in any large library. The problem with them is, they are
boring as hell and you have to dig much earth to find little gold, as
Heraclitus said.
The system of degrees was secret, but there are hints here and there
regarding their nature and if you assemble all these (a feat
impossible in ancient times) the nature of the degrees becomes
clear. Some have suggested the system was patterned after the three
degrees of initiation in Neo-Platonism, but that does not wash
because the Neo-Platonists came after the primitice church. The same
general structure was there, though: "purification" in the second
degree and epopteua (vision) in the third.
> Then there's the Pistis Sophia ... And
> what about the source/nature of the
> Pistis Sophia, eg ...
I don't understand that question. The PS is a gnostic tect from the
Valentinian school.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application