Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00299)

I think Bailey took some information from the ES of the TS and mixed 
it up with her own views and philosophy and then presented it as the 
work of the master DK. This is my opinion, but from looking at her 
material, that's exactly what it looks like to me. Maybe I'm wrong.

Anyway, when reading her work, it's wise to be sceptical and question 
her authority. You can do the same with HPB as well, and actually she 
recommends it. I forget this many times while reading HPB because I 
am so facinated by how much rings true and is eventually proved by 
science. But one can make a "religion" of her as well.

Many people make all kinds of claims to being channels (and claiming 
inaccuracies due to poor reception), but your theory on Bailey does 
sound intersting and plausable.

A^A^




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote:
> Hi Bart 
> Some Bailey enthusiasts claim she was the chosen one, but I am 
getting convinced that she made a mixture of correct chanelling with 
distorted personal views.
> My personal experiences with chanelling showed me that every 
communication with an extra-corporeal consciences encounters its 
natural barriers in the channel.
> Depending on the state of transparency of the channel, many purely-
personal insights may be subtlely mixed with the original flowing of 
the knowledge, causing distortions proportionally.
> I agree with another member who claimed that sometimes she used the 
name of DK to be more convincent.
> Her Christian views and sometimes antropomorphical view of Christos 
also influenced some views.
> 
> Krishtar
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Bart Lidofsky 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 5:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World A new torch-bearer?
> 
> 
> prmoliveira wrote:
> > But HPB did foresee the possibility of an advanced disciple of 
the 
> > Masters coming in the 20th century, as the quotes below seem to 
> > indicate. Do you have any idea whom he/she might have been, if 
it at 
> > all happened? 
> 
> Did she? The quote always seemed like more of an estimate than a 
> prediction.
> 
> Bart
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]