Theos-Talk Archives (February 2004 Message tt00172)

Bart wrote:

(...)A) Blavatsky was not an Adept. She wasn't even a particularly good 
choice for the projects the Adepts had in mind. She was just the best 
available at the time....(...)

Hi
My view is:
It is not true.
HPB although in a female human body and subject to certain limitations ofan incarnated ego showed many signs of her cosmic origins.
Although Master Kut Hoo Mi, in ML´s, referred this way about her, it is not difficult to see that an Adept is a human being who´s reached his highest point concerning to a top terrestrial evolution.
Between the lines it is possible to notice a little chauvinism in MasterKH sections.
We never conceive a master with human imperfections, it is our biggest mistake.
If she supposed got less merit, why would they choose her?


Krishtar
...................................................................................



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]