Theos-Talk Archives (February 2004 Message tt00086)

Hallo all,

My views are - in the below ---

from
M. Sufilight

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <ringding@blinx.de>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: The Secret Doctrine


> Morten, could you please specify what a Übermensch is?
***
The answers are only my views:

1. Well I have often wondered about what exactly that word covered and
what - A - word covered.
And I could come up with several interpretations. But would that help anyone
?
I think the word speaks for it self and gets interpreted on the level needed
by each individuals own
vehicles.
What my intentions are, will certainly be shown somewhere down the road.
***

> Is it what English people name a superman?
***
2. Now why don't we ask the english people ?
****
> Is a Übermensch the opposite of the Weltmensch?
***
3. This is one possible interpretation. But maybe it is not that likely to
be true.
***
> And how is the relation to the Theosophist?
***
4. It differs, because those who calls themselves theosophists are a strange
lot. (smile...)
***
> Does a Theosophist oppose a Übermensch?
***
5. Try "The Key to the Theosophy" by Blavatsky Section 2.
So I think the real theosophists neither oppose or support such a creature.
But mostly I think theosophists will protest against injustice and
totalitarian behaviour.
***
>
> Is there a place in nature for a Übermensch or has
> evolutionary development already ended with our generation
> as the crown of it?
***
6. This is an illogical question, if you use the word
"Übermensch" in a different manner.
Today there is Übermensch mentalities in certain western governments and
their activities
towards other groups and what they call those groups "middleage behaviour"
and even "non-democratical behaviour".
***
>
> If there is a Übermensch, does also exist a Untermensch?
***
7. Problably. But why don't you tell us Frank ?
You seem to have been studying this subject for years.
***

> Thanks.
> Frank

***
You are welcome.

from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...
http://home19.inet.tele.dk/global-theosophy/char_lit.htm

***




>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@adslhome.dk>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: The Secret Doctrine
>
>
> > Hallo all,
> >
> > My views are:
> >
> > Some books are meant for muslims.
> > Some are meant to be read by the übermensch.
> > Some are meant to be read by theosophists.
> > Others are meant to be read by other people.
> >
> > Try this link:
> > http://home19.inet.tele.dk/global-theosophy/char_lit.htm
> >
> > Did this help ?
> >
> > What are the germans doing in Afghanistan today ?
> > That is what bothers me !
> >
> >
> > from
> > M. Sufilight with peace and love...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "stevestubbs" <stevestubbs@yahoo.com>
> > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 2:15 AM
> > Subject: Theos-World Re: The Secret Doctrine
> >
> >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "geneticrejuvenation"
> > > <geneticrejuvenation@y...> wrote:
> > > > Would someone please tell me what is the secret doctrine or at
> > > > least why it should be secret from a good person who really wants
> > > to
> > > > know?
> > >
> > > The title "secret: refers to the fact that the book is written in
> > > such a way that hardly anybody who reads it understands it. The
> > > first part of the book is very profound but tha latter part merely
> > > requires more study than most are willing to put into it. Blavatsky
> > > admutted that in a magazine article. So even though it is published,
> > > it is still "secret" in a sense.
> > >
> > > As to why this would be desirable, that is a secret to me. I have
> > > yet to find out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>