Theos-Talk Archives (January 2004 Message tt00396)

Hi Krishtar,

Interesting question, and one we might all pose. So many times it 
seems that the person who is chosen for some role of leadership is 
inadequate. Perhaps it's a test of the doubter's nature, a test of 
loyalty and devotion, of obedience. If we accept the hierarchical 
geometry of the universe, and the principle of centralization, if we 
accept karma as a fact of nature, then we can see that when causes 
indicate, a new impulse is due to the consciousness of humanity, and 
some instrument, some individual human being (i.e Jesus, Krishna, 
Buddha, etc.) must be found to bring the new vibration through to the 
material plane. It makes sense that the one who gets that (thankless) 
job would be the one next in line, the one who had earned the 
opportunity. Speculating about the position in the hierarchy of such 
a one is rather self-defeating, since we don't even know our own 
position, and can hardly expect to be able to estimate another's. But 
if we consider the fact of the unity of all life, and apply this 
overarching principle to the question, it becomes evident that there 
is nothing strange about it at all. Humanity is evolving from 
unconsciousness to total consciousness. We (humanity) move along the 
evolution trail together. We each have a position in the whole 
constantly changing mosaic. All we are asked to do is fulfill that 
role to the best of our ability. If one falls out of line, from 
weakness or unwillingness, the next in line, the next one who has 
earned the opportunity, steps into place. None of us is 
irreplaceable. It is not a matter of individual success, but of 
cooperation for the benefit of the whole. 

Best wishes,
Adelasie

On 25 Jan 2004 at 17:13, krishtar wrote:

> Dears
> 
> Be the peace be with you all.
> 
> Why did all those masters choose HPB as their " representatives" and
> channel for registering the secret doctrines? Why couldnīt they
> themselves do the job? See: Thery were in major number; They were
> males - which could be much easier to be heard than a russian female,
> in a machist world, with so much health problems and physical
> limitations? They had developed inner powers - they were oriental, so
> why would they need to take a western woman to serve as an amanuensis
> and still a woman who required to be taken to Tibbet to be iniciated,
> trained, pretending to be a male in some occasions? It is not a doubt
> of mine, but have you ever thought of it? What can you say?
> 
> 
> Krishtar
>