Theos-Talk Archives (December 2003 Message tt00175)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> wrote:
> alden_parent wrote:
> > All is of course a liitle more than just this
> > but the exact proof that I have is more than sufficient
> > for me. I would need an attachment to show you its
> > completeness, so I will try another time to share it.
> 
> Well, other than the fact that Riemann's Theory has yet to be 
proven as 
> a general case, I cannot find ANY reference to any significance of 
the 
> number "7" connected with it, not even in the post you sent.
> 
> Bart




*****************************************************************

Dear Bart, 


How can one say that, one has not yet seen my proof!
It is all how you look at it. With what eyes that is!
Sarnak & Wiles could not comprehend it either when I
gave it to them. They have no comprehension of linear
numerical perspectives. One way viewing does not help.
I offered my proff @ alater time. Just be patient.


Alden