Re: What about the VISIT made to the Golden Temple
Nov 29, 2003 03:36 AM
by christinaleestemaker
To Netamara, used the 888 in the wrong way!
You are realy missing the way.
If the theosofist becomes to the buddhish areas then they are
completely on the intuitive level.
The Sikhs are not they the murderers of Ghandi, the very old Indian
wise man and if such a noble man must die by murdering the group have
had done that is the black side of life, also that is the way you
choose then.
Be attended, Christina
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "netemara888" <netemara888@y...>
wrote:
> by both Blavatsky and Olcott? I find "Old Diary Leaves" ODL to be a
> golden source of history and one which is accessible to everyone. I
> find it interesting in their love of comparative religions (which
> they lived and not just talked about) to be one which should have
> all of us scratching our heads. I mean they both took pansil--or
> were initiated as Buddhists and then fell in love with the Sikhs
and
> the ceremonies of the Golden Temple! I am not sure off the top of
my
> head if they were initiated into Sikhism, since they were not
> Indian, not sure if that was possible back then, but isn't it
> strange, not to me as I attended the Congress on World Religions,
> held in Chicago which only comes around every 100 years, that they
> went around in and out of religions like it was no big deal?
>
> This is one of my favorite stories about the chums, and it saddens
> me that no one really talks about Olcott and his role in the TS.
> However, Judge is no less an important character.
>
> On Radhasoami studies they are having a big discussion about the
> role of Salig Ram in shaping Radhasoami. Well, it seems that the
> later masters left out one little detail that SR had made clear:
> That everyone could initiate, not just the select line of chosen
> masters. That would be the same as saying that anyone could be a
> priest or perform the same rites as a priest as long as they were
> catholic and had observed the religion for a set period of time.
>
> What does that have to do with the TS today? Well, according to
> Alice Bailey, the TS as a spiritual organ is now defunct, dead,
> over. And if you go to TS meetings around the country, you will
find
> that it has an aura much like the moon, something is missing, and
> it's not just Netemara who finds this. Sure there are some meetings
> which may have a good number of people and meetings, but as an
> evolutionary role and spiritual organ the bataan (sp) or Dharma has
> been passed on to its successor.
>
> Netemara
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application