Theos-Talk Archives (November 2003 Message tt00066)

M, Haven't the faintest idea what you are talking about. And, getting tired 
of rereading old mail over and over again. So, would appreciate getting a 
direct question about any of the "issues" you might have brought up in any of 
your posts -- so I can give them a direct answer. The only reason that "Lenny 
post" was more agreeable to you is that you posed a direct question on bn--study 
that I could answer in a way that might be useful to some of my friends over 
there. (I write letters in these forums, fully aware that others might be 
reading them.)
L.

In a message dated 11/06/03 11:16:14 AM, mhart@idirect.ca writes:
(snip)
>L, If you had an idea that I probably knew 
>(or "surely knew") that all those names you 
>have used that start with L were all the same 
>guy, then, (one might wonder ...), why not 
>address the issues I brought up in my posts 
>(which I pasted at the bottom of this post, 
>again), rather than go on as if I were just 
>confused about which name is which (not that 
>you haven't told me often enough about how 
>confuing my posts are, but ...) ... At any 
>rate, regardless of how any one particular 
>L-named guy from your direction comes through 
>to me, or got through to me, from my 
>speculative perspective, that post from Lenny 
>did seem "more agreeable" to me, in a sense, 
>than some/many of Leon's posts. So, in a 
>sense, I was kind of kidding and serious at 
>the same time, regardless of how it all 
>seemed to you, L. As ususal, though, seems I 
>might've used "excessive" qualifiers or 
>whatever in those posts that I'm pasting here 
>again:
(snip)