Theos-Talk Archives (November 2003 Message tt00057)

In a message dated 11/05/03 6:23:40 AM, samblo@cs.com writes:

>Leon,
> Last night on PBS Nova I watched a very well done Program on "String
>Theory."
> As i watched it i wondered if you had caught it where you are and
>thought how (you) must have enjoyed it.
> John

Thanks John, for the information. No, I didn't see the program, but I've 
been to the PBS site where it is all explained 
<http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/> and enjoyed it immensely. I particularly liked the way they tried to 
picture simply and through animation how to imagine dimensions that are beyond 
those 3 metric dimensions we can easily picture. I also see this as the 
beginning of what HPB predicted; That science in this century would finally come to 
realize that theosophy was telling the whole truth about the true nature of 
both unconditioned and conditioned reality. 

Unfortunately, while this is a start in the right direction, they aren't all 
the way there yet.:-) But, just give it another few years -- and theosophy a
nd its practical idealist view of the universe will finally be fully vindicated 
by those same scientists who until then had given credence to its skeptics 
and detractors.

Before this happens, the only problem I see (and why I could laugh a bit when 
I studied their theory) is that, while they have successfully correlated 
quantum and relativity theories, they are trying to explain it all from the wrong 
direction of view. That is, by using the reductionist method to understand the 
general principles (or the origin of everything) -- i.e., looking at it from 
the outside in, rather than from the inside out... As I do in my ABC theory, 
where we start from the dimensionless zero-point and its abstract motion or 
"spinergy," and trace its essentially spherical expansion in a completely logical 
progression, through the transcendental hyperspace dimensions, as they 
fractally involve down and, after breaking their symmetry, finally evolve to the 4-D 
space (3 metric dimensions plus time) we experience... And, eventually, end 
up with something similar to Superstring/ M-brane theory -- but coming to it 
from the opposite direction. (See my web sites below) 

While Superstring theory's 10 (or more) dimensional mathematics accurately 
describes this multidimensionality of primal space, such math doesn't depend on 
which direction you view such space from. So, the Superstring theorist's 
choice of looking from the outside in, is simply because they are forced to take 
the reductionist view that tries to add up the observable particulars to 
understand the unobservable general case, or the whole. (Thus, they can still keep 
separate the religious, idealistic, or theosophical view, and maintain their 
scientific materialistic view that matter precedes consciousness -- which, to 
them, must be due solely to the brain's neurological complexity.) Of course, 
until they include the cause and explain the "binding" of mind and brain, and 
the experience of consciousness in their theory, it can never be the true 
"Theory of Everything" they are looking for.

Unfortunately (for them), however, the whole is not the sum of its parts -- 
since the Cosmos must begin at a truly zero (or non dimensional) point (which 
can be nothing less than pure consciousness itself, as well as infinitely 
energetic). And, therefore, it can expand fractally to an infinite series of such 
points to fill any dimension (or rather, frequency/energy phase order) of 
hyperspace -- which, in essence, must therefore be infinitely divisible... Both 
outside that non-dimensional (to us) zero-point as well as inside it. 

[Consider that the zero-point in any hyperspace field is the only non 
dimensional [immeasurable] aspect of that particular field (that has its own 
particular frequency/energy-phase of vibratory motion). Also, since all fields are, 
in essence, substantial to varying degrees and can be considered material as 
well as subject to change and, thus, time -- the only (nonlinear) thing 
"outside" of such time and space, is the zero-point itself... As, consciousness or 
subjectivity is always separate from matter or objectivity. Yet, they are always 
interdependently arising. One the observer, the other the observed.]

Although, this zero-point origin expanding fractally into infinite 
coenergetic and multidimensional fields may be impossible to fully imagine in our mind's 
eye, it is, nevertheless, a logically consistent conclusion based on 
fundamental principles. That's why the full mysteries of the infinite Universe can 
never be completely known to the finite minds that inhabit it. (No matter what 
hyperspace field their consciousness happens to be focussed in.) Therefore, 
it's easy to consider that there may be individual "lives" limited to the 
astral, and even the mental and akashic realms, that cannot examine or observe 
anything outside of their own hyperspace dimension -- which is as real to them as 
this one is to us. 

Thus, as physical beings, we cannot be sensorily aware of the hyperspace 
dimensions we live in. Although, in deep meditation, such as described in the 
Voice of the Silence and Patanjali's Yoga Aphorisms, our zero-point of individual 
Self consciousness, can be isolated from the senses and thus can experience 
these dimensions directly. In fact, every time we think abstractly, 
concentrate our attention one pointedly, imagine, or dream -- our consciousness is 
focussed within one of these hyperspace dimensions... Where, information is carried 
as holographic interference patterns on the circumferences or M-branes of 
their respective fields -- detectable only by a coherent ray of equivalent 
frequency energy phase that is projected outward (by the energy of willful intent) 
from its zero-point center, and reflected back to its source. 

The only reason the Superstring theorists see only 10 dimensions (6 of 
hyperspace + 3 of our material space + time) -- is that their equations are 
dependent on the fundamental laws of cycles which break the cyclic patterns of field 
expansion and involution into octaves (6 hyperspace + 1 metric [our visual or 
sidereal light] space). All they can see with their mathematics, however, is 
perhaps, the third octave from the beginning of our Cosmos. However, there are 
an infinite number of such iterations possible starting from our cosmic 
zero-point and its abstract motion or "spinergy." This makes credible the 
theosophical view (based on fundamental laws of cycles, periodicity, harmony, 
electricity, etc., that imply supersymmetry and conservation of energy throughout all 
dimensions of cosmic and pre-cosmic space); that there are at least 49 stages 
within each evolution of fields within fields within fields, etc... Starting 
from the origin of the Cosmos, and extending down to the sub microscopic 
particle/waves such as, photons, quarks, and finally, the physical "strings" that the 
scientific theory of Superstrings postulate -- but can't directly observe or 
measure. 

This, of course, doesn't rule out the theosophical view that there are non 
dimensional (from our point of view) "strings" (or rays of energy) that make up 
the composition of each hyperspace field extending as far out to the first 
triune spiritual fields that formed the present Cosmos as it exploded out of its 
primal singularity (which still remains infinitely divisible). Thus, Brahma 
stems from Parabrahm, which stems from Paraparabrahm, which stems from 
Paraparaparabrahm, etc., ad infinitum, as the eastern philosophers have been telling 
us for ages. Since, all these fields must originate at a common zero-point, 
this is the basis of assuming that each individual human consciousness is simply 
a zero-point of awareness (at the source and center of its triune Monad) 
reflecting directly from, and entangled with the initial zero-point of initial 
Cosmic awareness. 

Since, physically, we are all essentially, made up out of light, and each 
hyperspace field has its own limiting light velocity, it's perfectly natural that 
when we approach that limit, both sidereal time and 3-D space come to an end 
for us. But, since our center of consciousness is separate from this 
physicality, that doesn't preclude out continued conscious existence on any one or 
more of the higher levels of our being or, at least (as long as this universe 
exists) in our individual monad. 

Truly, the universe is like an infinitely complex hall of essentially simple 
mirrors whose smallest and largest dimensions would have to be in the shape of 
a triangle. Another example of this is the fractal division or multiplication 
of an octahedron or diamond shape (which can be perfectly inscribed in a 
sphere) into an infinite number of octahedrons that extend from zero to infinity. 
Therefore, to deny the existence of the zero-point outside of all time and 
space, and the infinite fractal iterations of its expanding and contracting 
spinergy is to deny the existence of this whole physical universe, as well as our 
own existence. 

Does this make a bit clearer everything HPB explained about these 
unimaginable (although possible) infinities (and their finite iterations) in the Secret 
Doctrine? I hope so. Then maybe, someday, when Superstring theory and its 
offshoot into M-brane theory (which explains the bubble-like surfaces of the 
coenergetic fields postulated in the ABC theory) is fully accepted by science as a 
true "Theory of Everything" (including consciousness and mind) -- the world 
will also accept the conclusions of rounds and races, along with karma and 
reincarnation -- also postulated by the corresponding theosophical as well as ABC 
precepts. 

Then, maybe, everyone will begin to understand the meaning of the Hermetic 
and Kabbalistic statements, "As above, so below," "The measure of Man is three 
score and ten," "As you sow, so shall you reap," etc., and give credence to the 
idea of the sevenfold division of primary fields within the human body that 
stems from the initial triune monadic fields centered in the Heart Chakra). 

Incidentally, such living "monads" are the first triple field iteration of 
any progression of strings or rays of energy emanating out of any zero-point 
throughout all the infinite universes that are possible (down to the universe of 
"lives" within each human being). 

Thus, in the Book of Dzyan (referring to the genesis of our Cosmos) it is 
implied that number starts from no number, that the first number is three, and 
follows the series, "The three, the one, the four, the one, the five, the twice 
seven, the sum total." (See this pictured in the "chakrafield" diagram on one 
of the web sites below.) 

That's about all for now. More later, if I hear the right questions or 
leads. :-)

Best wishes,

LHM

http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/evolution2.html
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif