[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 30, 2003 09:36 AM
by Bart Lidofsky
Hallo Bart and all of you, My views are: Yes. But the year is still at least 1732 isn't it ? Look at item 4.