Theos-Talk Archives (October 2003 Message tt00199)

Thanks, Leon, for your comments. I'm trying 
to learn from them. When I wrote: <<maybe if 
I were to try a kind of speculative Zen-like 
approach on these lists>> I meant "as I tend 
to speculatively see it." In other words, I 
might be the first to say that I'm not 
qualified to offer much if anything in the 
way of "proven sense or facts" on these lists 
about Theosophy, so that's why I've been 
trying to qualify my words as being 
speculative. Sorry about that. I'm 
suggesting that all I'm offering and have 
offered on these list are my humble 
speculative opnions, or MHSO. Sorry about 
that. Basically, apparently, I seem to be 
against taking anything much for granted, and 
so have tended to lean toward a kind of 
speculative approach toward life in general. 
You guys on these lists are not the only 
ones who are, in a sense, receiving my 
spculativeness. I hope this speculative 
attempt to explain something about my 
"basics," in a sense, wasn't too confusing.

Speculatively,
Mauri

PS I might ask which letter you're referring 
to in the foregoing, re <<I don't think I 
asked you to explain your communication 
problem>>...

PPS Also, as I tried to explain to Reed (on
Blavatsky Net) about my "qualifiers," I'm 
trying to turn over a new leaf (if somewhat 
speculatively).

Leon wrote: <<What? What? What did you say? 
Would you mind repeating that again in plain 
English and tell us what it has to do with 
discussing theosophy? Did you read my letter 
and "hear" what was said? I don't think I 
asked you to explain your communication 
problem. I thought I carefully explained to 
you what it was and what to do to correct it. 
Judging by this response, it appears, you 
don't listen much. Too bad. With hope, Leon >>>>