Theos-Talk Archives (October 2003 Message tt00081)

The freed leaves dive quickly to mother earth as a covering for the cold yet
still venomous coil of snake laying curled on its back -- that soft snake
belly bathed in virgin bright sunlight. Lo here, the air is putrid. Lo
there, the snake is dead.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel H. Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: Theos-World More on Leon's phrase: "certain disgruntled
'organizationalists'. . . "


> Leon, you wrote:
>
> "This whole discussion does nothing but obscure the
> teachings of fundamental theosophy, still sounds
> like a vendetta against ULT and WQJ by certain
> disgruntled 'organizationalists'. . . "
>
> I replied:
>
> "Please be more specific, WHO are the
> disgruntled 'organizationalists'?? Do you
> refer to me? To Tony? To Peter?"
>
> Leon, you then replied in turn:
>
> "No offense intended. If the shoe fits, wear it.
> If not, forget it. :-)"
>
> Leon, I have looked up the terms in the dictionary
> but it is NOT clear to me why you felt the need
> to bring up the phrase "certain
> disgruntled 'organizationalists'. . . " or exactly
> what it means.
>
> You even put in quotation marks the word:
> organizationalists. You must have had
> some idea in your mind especially to add
> the word "disgruntled".
>
> If you really believe Peter, Tony and I are
> "disgruntled 'organizationalists'" then don't
> be shy, call a spade a spade if that is the case.
>
> All I ask is that you explain exactly
> what you mean by this phrase. I can't read
> your mind.
>
> As written without further explanation, the
> phrase reads like an "ad hominem" remark possibly
> thrown out by you to distract attention from the issue
> being discussed.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>