Theos-Talk Archives (October 2003 Message tt00067)

Dallas, please consider & give us your answer to Peter M.'s relevant 
question:

Peter wrote in his post to Leon:

"As a 'by the way', it is not clear to me that 
Judge did carry out all the alterations to THE VOICE. 
For prior to Judge's 1893 edition, there was a
London edition published in 1892, after HPB had died, 
and probably done by G.R. Mead. This earlier edition 
contains all the alterations that Daniel mentioned in his recent 
post. Perhaps Judge did not realise that changes had 
been made to it when it passed through his hands - who knows. 
But I wonder, will you and ceertain others still be happy 
with the alterations made to THE VOICE if it turns out 
to be altered by Mead and possibly Besant rather than by Judge?"

I highlight the question again:

". . . I wonder, will you [Leon] and ceertain others still be happy 
with the alterations made to THE VOICE if it turns out 
to be altered by Mead and possibly Besant rather than by Judge?"

Dallas, what if this edition of the VOICE "turns out 
to be altered by Mead and possibly Besant rather than by Judge", 
does that change in any way your current position about the Judge
edition of the VOICE???

Daniel

http://hpb.cc