Theos-Talk Archives (September 2003 Message tt00004)

Hi Morten,

Glad to see my website gets studied. I agree on one point you make 
here, about note 3. With the next update that one will be deleted. 
Unfortunately Barry Tompson has not yet finished his paper on this 
subject, so the extent of his research can't yet be assessed. 

Katinka
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:
> Hi Daniel and all of you,
> 
> 
> Thanks for your kind email.
> 
> You have a link to the following page Daniel.
> http://www.katinkahesselink.net/metaphys/th-bowen.htm
> 
> I just read the Bowen paper and the footnotes attached to them by 
Katinka
> Hesselink. One has to say thanks to her for putting them online. 
Even so I
> disagree with the footnotes made by Katinka. And just to let you 
know, my
> fast written view on the matter - I email this to Theos-Talk 
readers:
> 
> 
> On note 3 + 5. It is not nonsense - if the notes were made to 
disciples. -
> Those who can read the Akasha - recordings or parts of it 
understand this as
> not being nonsense. The authors imprints are always there.
> You know Blavatsky never really favoured dead-letter reading.