Theos-Talk Archives (August 2003 Message tt00138)

Thank you for your profound advice -- as well as your equally profound 
misquotes. :-) 

As an added note... What we ponder on in the secret chamber of our own heart 
has nothing to do with what is discussed on this open forum. When you butt 
in, it would be nice if you read the original question and knew what you were 
talking about. BTW, have you ever read the Mahabarata, or the Bhagavad Gita (as 
a small part of it) and studied or pondered their allegorical meanings on all 
four levels of fundamental reality? What makes you think that others on this 
forum have not done so? You, of all people (claiming to know more than HPB 
:-) should know that there are no legends that do not have a profound or a 
mundane meaning on each of those levels. But this discussion (from our initial 
point of view) was limited to the physical and astrological interpretations -- 
although I'm sure we would welcome any interpretations on any other levels. (HPB 
managed to do that very well.) Your implications of profound knowledge that 
you are unwilling to, or can't explain, is like the emptiness talking to the 
void. Sincerely, leonmaurer@aol.com

In a message dated 08/24/03 6:02:19 PM, wry1111@earthlink.net writes:

>From: "stevestubbs" <stevestubbs@yahoo.com>
>To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 1:31 PM
>Subject: Re: Theos-World a question for the scholars/philosophers on board
>
>> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:
>> > In a message dated 08/23/03 11:50:31 AM, stevestubbs@y... writes:
>> > Since the Mahabarata legends spoke of great "flying machines" that
>> > used "weapons of light" that could destroy entire cities, if such a war
>>> took place 5000
>> > years ago, archeological remnants of such weapons and machines
>>> should be still
>> > remaining.
>
>I see you folks are still deeply emmeshed in your profound philosophical
>speculations. I'm sure it has most likely not occurred to to many on here,
>if any, but perhaps the above material be it from the Ramayana or wherever
>was intended to be allegorical. I will not tell you what "city" or the rest
>of this could be suggesting, as this would be robbing some one on here
>the possibility to develop his active force by pondering. Sincerely, Wry