Theos-Talk Archives (July 2003 Message tt00038)

Thursday, July 03, 2003

Re GIANT relicts in branch of GRAND CANYON discovered

Dear M.

I agree it would be interesting to do.

But like you I don't have the time to initiate and follow up on
such.

You have already done a lot.

I keep it on the "back burner" as unfinished business -- to be
done if and when someone really wants to take it up. The old
photos and reports must still be on file.

I would be fascinating to go through some of those for the
benefit of present readers and enquirers -- there may be far more
than we realize.

I don't know of any one to whom this might be of interest.

Possibly the authors of FORBIDDEN ARCHEOLOGY Mr. Cremo, might
entertain it with the evidence so far gathered.

Best wishes,

Dallas

=======================
P S
I also gave reference to THEOSOPHY Magazine volumes.

Here are the page numbers if someone is interested in reading and
tracing these down.


THEOSOPHY Magazine
Dr. Hubbard	Dr. Osborn
------------------------------------	------------------

Vol. 11, pp. 386, 526	Osborn p. 191
12 377
13	281, 360, 402-3 Osborn p. 567
14	380
16	.	. Osborn p. 236
17	235-7, 777-8
25	138-9
34	357, 439,
35	184
37	38,
55	313

================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Ma
Sent:	Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:52 AM
To:
Subject:	on National Geographic and Giants, Dallas,

Dallas, an email from a representative of National Geographic
advised that the society generally does not initiate
investigations,
but that their Committee for research and exploration considers
proposals from scientists who do; and that if they feel that the
proposal has merit, the Committee then offers a grant to help the
scientists with their research work. Apparently they often
publish
articles on the research work that they support. I was told that
they would be happy to consider a proposal for an investigation
into this, and that information on their program of research
support is available on their website at:

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/research/grant/rg1.html.

I personally am in no position to do any investigating, but would
like to see somebody verify some or all of the various leads, and
then (possibly?) publish an article about that topic in, for
example, the National Geographic. Would somebody reading
this have some interest along those lines, even as much as to
check out and report on:

<<1 at the archives of the Geology Dept. University of
California in San Francisco and

2 at the archives of the Dept. of Geology in Washington D C
[also LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ]>>

I wonder if anybody who is living or visiting in those areas
might
have some interest in looking up whatever records and photos
that might still remain in those archives?

Of course one might presume (?) that there may be a number of
mainstream athropologists and archeologists who might not take
kindly to having their current belief-structures and theories
investigated and questioned, so I suspect that any investigation
along those lines would necessarily have to be rather
clandestine,
tactful, sophisticated, etc, for it to get anywhere at all, if
during
those investigations one might expect helpful cooperation from
those who might be somewhat constrained by a rather
mainstream, or average, world view, at least with respect to
archeology/anthropology and related sciences.

Speculatively,
Mauri