Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00058)

Monday, June 09, 2003

Sorry Katinka.


Will remember that.

But there is somethig amiss here:

I am quite unaware of sending that out, as I am careful to edit,
and this seems unedited. Curious. I am really puzzled. I
never read your comment to begin with, until you send it to me
now.

I would have no reason to forward your comment out to anyone over
theos-talk, so I am truly puzzled. Are the elementals playing
games?

Some error I am sure. -- but how and why ?

Dal

========================

-----Original Message-----
From: Katinka Hesselink [
Sent:	Monday, June 09, 2003 1:31 AM
To:
Subject:	Theos-World Re: lodge work



Hi Dallas,

I really don't appreciate my words being sent to other lists than
the
one I sent it to.

Katinka


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, <dalval14@e...> wrote:
> Sunday, June 08, 2003
> >From: Katinka Hesselink <mail@k...>
> >Reply-To: Blavatsky_Study@yahoogroups.com
> >To: Blavatsky_Study@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [Blavatsky_Study] Re: lodge work
> >Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >Hi Munise ,
> >In my experience each theosophical group or lodge has their
> >own style. Still, it can be useful to learn what other
> >people have done, in order to find out how your own style
> >can be deepened (if needed). I do think it is unfortunate
> >if one style is elevated above another.
> >
> >Recently there was a discussion at a theosophical meeting
> >about a lodge that dealt with theosophy from a very
> >intellectual perspective. Intuition and heart-knowledge
> >were played down on in that group, especially if one wasn't
> >able to put it into words. This is unfortunate, but the
> >other extreme, where no body looks up anything any more,
> >for instance, would also be unfortunate. A group needs a
> >certain equilibrium between extremes.
> >
> >Don't know if this is what you meant, but it came to mind
> >reading your mail.
> >Katinka