[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
May 29, 2003 07:53 AM
by Nisk98114
Message: 4 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 23:16:26 -0400 From: Mauri <mhart@idirect.ca> Subject: re Bill's "watching myself react" Bill wrote: <<I react to Wry's writings. For that opportunity to see myself, I am thankful. Bill>> On the subject of reacting to whoever and whatever, one might wonder who or what is watching the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher of the watcher, and so on to logical infinity, of the "myself" that's reacting ... If there isn't a logical ultimate reality to such watchers, other than as per whatever initial assumptions (as per one's exoteric/logical notions about such as "Higher and Higher and Higher Self," etc, without logical end), then wouldn't there be some sense (as by way of interest, at least?) in somehow transcending, or in at least aspiring to transcend, certain kinds of merely logical, karmic, mayavic evaluations (re "forms of existence"?), to some extent, in favor of, say, some forms of intuitive (or even speculative ... ^:-) "evaluations" or somewhat esoteric/experiential experiences, maybe, in a sense, in some cases ... Not that some helpful clues aren't basically/logically available, obviously enough, in many ways, but if there are some "Theosophic types" (for example?) who might have some interest in transcending karma, well ... ^:-) ... Speculatively, Mauri PS I guess that was another shot at trying to find words that might "explain" something about what might be called the "basic differences" between "exoteric" and "esoteric/Occult." Not that we don't all "logically" know about such things. ========================================= i think you dun it good this time, Mauri. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]