Theos-Talk Archives (May 2003 Message tt00211)

"Robert Crosbie: His Special Status in the ULT's "History" of Modern 
Theosophy" 
by David Green 
Quoted from:
http://members.tripod.com/davidgreen_2/specialstatus.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In a series of articles appearing in Theosophy magazine, the U.L.T.'s 
official journal, Mr Robert Crosbie made a series of claims about W Q 
Judge, about the various esoteric sections then in existence, and 
about the true School of the Masters. The following excerpts give 
some indication of Crosbie's claims--- 

"H.P. Blavatsky and W.Q. Judge, in their capacity of Messengers, 
cannot be separated; They stand or fall together. . . ." Theosophy, 
February 1915. 

"H.P.B. and W.Q.J. came from another world, separated from human 
consciousness by a great gulf. They established a bridge between 
their world and ours. They were in constant connection and 
communication with the Lodge . . . ." Theosophy, July 1915. 

". . . Those who represented the Masters of the Great Lodge were not 
casual students attracted to a philosophy, nor mere tyros in 
occultism, but Initiates-----masquerading in the mortal garments 
known as H.P. Blavatsky and William Q. Judge. This is a matter of 
knowledge to living persons today." Theosophy, April 1915. 

In regards to Crosbie's last sentence, who were these "living 
persons" about whom Robert Crosbie was writing? How does he know 
about this? Was Mr Crosbie one of those "living persons"? 

". . . The various theosophical societies and esoteric sections of 
the day are in no sense representative of the School of the Masters 
or the Theosophical Movement. . . The Anciently universal Wisdom-
Religion, the School of the Masters and the Theosophical Movement are 
in unbroken continuity of existence to-day as always. . . .Now, as 
always, they have their representatives and agents among men, who 
cannot be found out by any but those who have earned the right to 
know them. . . ." Theosophy, February 1915. 

Who are these agents, one might ask? 

"Today, after a quarter of a century, there are no less than three 
widely heralded ---and a half dozen lesser known---'outer 
heads,' 'esoteric sections,' 'visible agents,' and what-not, all 
issuing 'orders,' 'instructions,' and 'teachings,' professedly 
emanating from the Masters of H.P.B. and from H.P.B. herself. . . . 
No Brahmanism, no Catholicism, no Jesuitry, has ever exceeded the 
arrogance of its pretensions to spiritual authority on the part of 
its leaders. . . ." Theosophy, July 1915. 

Note that Mr Crosbie does not hesitate to offer harsh criticism of 
the various Esoteric Sections of Mrs Besant, Mrs Tingley, Mr Hargrove 
and others. Again how does Robert Crosbie know these "facts"? These 
are strong claims and harsh words on Mr Crosbie's part. 

These esoteric sections were private organizations. Was it Mr 
Crosbie's business to harshly criticize what was going on in private 
groups? I bring this issue up because my present-day critic, Mr 
Richard Taylor, a ULT associate, has told me that I have no right to 
investigate the private claims of the U.L.T. He's stated that the 
existence and workings of the ULT's Esoteric School is "none of my 
business." Will Mr Taylor chastise Robert Crosbie for commenting on 
things which were really none of his business? If Mr Taylor feels 
so strongly about this issue, he should (in all fairness) petition 
the Theosophy Company to stop selling copies of their book The 
Theosophical Movement, 1951 ed. For example, this U.L.T. book 
harshly criticizes the private esoteric school of Mrs Tingley.

"If, then, the true Theosophical Movement, and the true Chelas of the 
School of the Masters are not to be found among those who have lost 
the point of contact with the Masters, while yet loudly proclaiming 
themselves Initiates and Outer and Inner Heads of this, that, and the 
other theosophical society and esoteric section, where may they be 
discerned? . . ." Theosophy, March 1915 

Yes, tell us Mr Crosbie, where and how may they be discerned? 

". . . The actual name of the School of the Masters [is not] used by 
any of the so-called esoteric sections of the now numerous 
Theosophical Societies." 

How does Robert Crosbie know this? Does he have "inside" information? 

"Much of the instructions and communications in connection with the 
Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society, and much regarding its 
history, are necessarily of such a pledged or sacred character that 
they cannot be made public. But enough is believed to be of public 
record to make possible a clear tracing of the lines of cause and 
effect for the benefit of all students, and definite indices for all 
who may come in touch with the private papers of the Section." 

Who are the persons "who may come in touch with the private papers of 
the Section"? To what is Crosbie really referring? Is Mr Crosbie 
actually referring in a veiled way to the members of his own esoteric 
section "The Dzyan Esoteric School" ?

"After her [H.P.B.'s] death in 1891, the Esoteric Section--now School 
[the Second Section] -- was reorganized. Mr. Judge was looked to and 
accepted by all as the LINK between the School [2nd Section] and the 
Masters [1st Section], and between the School [2nd Section] and the 
Society [3rd Section]. It is clear in our minds that the last phrase 
of H.P.B.: 'KEEP THE LINK UNBROKEN; DO NOT LET MY LAST INCARNATION 
BE A FAILURE,' referred directly to Mr. Judge." Theosophy magazine, 
June 1915, page 371.

How does Mr Crosbie know all of this? Even more importantly, what 
happened to the LINK at Mr Judge's death? In 1896 was the link 
finally broken? 

Yet some four years later, in 1919, Mr John Garrigues declared in Mr 
Crosbie's obituary in Theosophy magazine--- 

"Robert Crosbie preserved unbroken the link of the Second Section 
[the Esoteric School] of the Theosophical Movement from the passing 
of Mr. Judge in 1896, and in 1907--just eleven years later--made that 
link once more Four Square amongst men. In the year 1909 the Third 
Section was restored by the formation of the United Lodge of 
Theosophists...." Theosophy magazine, Volume 7, page 289. 

In regards to the "Third Section" said to be restored by the 
formation of the U.L.T., Mr Crosbie had written four years previously-
-- 

"The Theosophical Society as a whole---meaning thereby the 'Third 
Section' of the original foundation---definitely broke off its 
connection with the Masters at the period of the Coulomb conspiracy 
in 1884-5. . . ." Theosophy, June 1915. 

When the Third Section was restored in 1909, was the connection with 
the Masters reestablished?

Mr Garrigues makes the following claims---- 

"H.P. Blavatsky, as all know, was the Mother and Creator of the 
Theosophical Movement of the nineteenth century. . . . [Concerning W 
Judge] H.P.B.'s statements [are clear] that he was the Preserver of 
Theosophy and the Heart and Soul of the Second [Esoteric] Section. 
Upon her death Mr. Judge was compelled by the exigencies of the 
Movement to stand in her stead. . . ." 

"There is always one Witness on the scene. After the death of Mr. 
Judge, Robert Crosbie kept the link unbroken. . . .None at the time 
suspected, and none has to this day suspected, that the quiet, 
earnest, steadfast man whose heart and soul were assimilated to the 
nature of H.P.B. and W.Q.J. was to be in fact the agent for the 
regeneration of the Theosophical Movement on the lines laid down 
from the beginning by the Masters. H.P.B. was the Creator, W.Q.J. was 
the Preserver, and Robert Crosbie was the Regenerator of pure 
Theosophy." Bold added.

This is quite an astounding claim made by Mr Garrigues. How did Mr 
Crosbie keep "the link unbroken"? 

". . . The hints she [H.P.B.] gave in relation to Mr. Judge were not 
grasped by the ambitious, the greedy for occult preferment. . . .The 
hints Mr. Judge gave in regard to Mr. Crosbie were not perceived by 
those whose only thought was their own advancement or their own 
position. After the death of H.P.B., Mr. Judge gave out such 
statements in regard to her nature and mission as, if taken, would 
have shown the students where to find the link of the Dzyan. So, in 
like manner, after the death of Mr. Judge, Robert Crosbie gave out 
such statements in respect of Mr. Judge as, if taken, would have 
preserved the unity of all the student body of Theosophists." 

". . . In the years from 1896 to 1906, Mr. Crosbie did what could be 
done for those whose lack of discrimination placed them at the mercy 
of claimants and self-styled agents of the Masters. Through the long 
roll of passing years he remained faithful and true without 
variableness or the shadow of turning, to Masters, Their Message and 
Their Messengers. When the time of trial was over he found grateful 
and loyal comrades to hold up his hands in the gigantic task of 
restoring that which had become lost and obscured. The work [was] 
revivified in 1906 . . . ." 

In the last paragraph, Mr Garrigues fails to mention that from 1896 
to 1904 Mr Crosbie was one of those who also lacked discrimination 
and had placed himself at the mercy of one 'claimant', Mrs Katherine 
Tingley. Mr Garrigues also fails to inform his reading audience that 
during the years in question Mr Crosbie had proclaimed his undying 
allegiance to Mrs Tingley, and had defended her in the strongest of 
terms as the true and only successor to H.P.B. and W.Q.J. Yet Mr 
Garrigues contends, "Robert Crosbie preserved unbroken the link of 
the Second Section. . . from the passing of Mr. Judge in 1896, and in 
1907--just eleven years later--made that link once more Four Square 
amongst men"!!

In 1915 Mr Crosbie was writing a very different history about H.P.B., 
W.Q.J. and K.T. Mrs Tingley was no longer in the picture! And 
behind the scenes, claims were being made by and about Mr Crosbie as 
the Agent, as the Link, etc. to the School of the Masters. For 
decades, the inner circle in the U.L.T. Los Angeles has declared 
(both implicitly and explicitly) the unique and special status of 
the U.L.T. founder. 

Here are two more quotes to supplement what has already been given----

"[Mr Crosbie]. . . identified himself with the DZYAN [Esoteric] 
section of the Theosophical Movement and the T.S., and was for many 
years the devoted and close Companion of William Q. Judge, and an 
occult pupil of H.P. Blavatsky. . . ." Theosophy magazine, 1919, 
Volume 7, page 320

Here a special claim is given without any evidence that Mr Crosbie 
was a "close Companion" of Mr Judge as well as an "occult pupil" of 
Madame Blavatsky. No explanation is given of what is meant by the 
words "close Companion" or "occult pupil." How many other occult 
pupils did H.P. Blavatsky have? How unique was Crosbie's pupilage? 
The U.L.T. writer doesn't supply such pertinent information. 

In Theosophy magazine for November 1929, a U.L.T. writer 
proclaims "the glorious example of Masters' Messengers to the world, 
the Transmitters of the Wisdom-Religion. Among These, and in our own 
time and country: H.P. Blavatsky, William Q. Judge, and Robert 
Crosbie. . . ."

Here in no uncertain terms Mr. Crosbie is declared one of "Masters' 
Messengers to the world" along side Mme. Blavatsky and Mr. Judge. 

Additional quotes of a similar nature will be found in my completed 
paper.

>From the above it is obvious to an impartial person that Mr. 
Garrigues and other U.L.T. officials made special claims about Robert 
Crosbie as well as giving Mr. Crosbie a very unique status in the 
Theosophical Movement. These claims were believed by many ULT 
associates especially by the inner circle of the Los Angeles U.L.T.