Theos-Talk Archives (March 2003 Message tt00123)

Erica Letzerich wrote:
> But Bush seems already decided to attack independent
> of the United Nations resolution. 
Probably. Unless Saddam Hussein either resigns, or actually keeps the 
promises he's been making for the past 12 years, while the U.N. keeps 
giving him ANOTHER last last last last last last this time for real last 
last we're serious last last last chance. While countries like France 
and Germany break their own promises by selling Hussein materials for 
weapons development, in return for billions of dollars in concessions, 
at the expense of the Iraqi people. While Iraqi's continue to get 
slaughtered by the thousands (hell, at least it isn't hundreds of 
thousands any more). While Arab counties continue to sponsor terrorists, 
while claiming, "It isn't US. It's just those people we're paying and 
training. But they have nothing to do with US."

And let's not forget one factor. Israel. Which has nuclear weapons, and 
a Mutually Assured Destruction strategy. If terrorist activity does not 
stop, if a weapon of mass destruction gets used against Israel, the 
nukes will come flying, destroying the Middle East oil supply and 
bringing civilization to a grinding halt (the dream of those who have 
been organizing the peace marches, if you read the literature of their 
parent organizations; they really believe that a Communist paradise will 
arise from the ashes).

> If he breaks the U.N. agreement the world is going to
> be in state of war. I believe a new dictator is
> arising. Let’s see with the counting down until 15 of
> March what the results are going to be.
How many countries has the United States taken over in the past 100 years?

> Also Americans are planning to use chemical weapons in
> Iraqi.
Name one.

> Europe is boiling right now. 
Europe has rendered itself irrelevant.

Bart Lidofsky