Bill's Reference to "a group of 'believes-in-masters' people"
Jan 15, 2003 08:35 AM
by D. H. Caldwell " <email@example.com>
Bill, you wrote:
". . . [Here on Theos-Talk there is] a group of 'believes-in-masters'
people, led by Daniel and some others, (although they will most
likely claim they are being led by HPB and the Masters) (and maybe
they are). . . ."
I find this reference by you intriguing, to say the least.
Who belongs to this "group" besides me? Nicholas Weeks, Dallas
TenBroeck, Steve Stubbs or ...... ?
For example, a while ago on Theos-Talk Steve Stubbs wrote:
". . . the only proof we can have of the masters' historical
existence is testimony from a qualified witness, and we have that
from Olcott. . . . Olcott's testimony is sufficient in my judgment to
establish their corporeal existence as legal persons. . . . I cannot
agree with anyone that they were fictions, fantasies, imagined
beings, trance personalities, or any such thing as that unless the
Olcott evidence can be satisfactorily disposed of. I raised that
question some time ago, and no one has ever addressed it, so for that
reason I remain stubbornly convinced that the mahatmas were real men
as they were claimed to be." Quoted from:
Does Steve claim to be led "by HPB and the Masters"? Does Nicholas
or Dallas or I claim something similar?
Bill, what reliable information are you basing your assertions on? Or
are you just merely speculating as Mauri might?
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application