theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Why is Faivre wrong in lumping Bailey with the Prophets, Ballards, etc.?

Jan 13, 2003 12:26 PM
by D. H. Caldwell " <info@blavatskyarchives.com>


A further elucidation.

Phillip, you comment:

"Funny I have seen the likes of Faivre et al lump AAB [Bailey]in with 
them [Prophets, Ballards, Steiner (?), etc.]! Talk about ignorant 
prejudice!"

Phillip, it would help readers on this forum to better understand 
your view and thinking on this subject if you would be more explicit 
as to WHY Faivre was mistaken in "lumping" Bailey with the rest of 
them.

What did Faivre fail to take into account?

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
http://hpb.cc






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application