Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00731)

I have never heard about two Moses. I don't see any mention about volcanos
in the Bible.
Arabs, or the sons of Ishmael were roaming beduins, nomads, they presumably
migrated from Palestine to Arabia. In the writings of Josefus Flavius there
is a mention about a war between Judea and and an Arab country, maybe 100
years or so before Christ, maybe a war Herod led against them. They used to
invade and loot. In the Torah they are being mentioned as some kind of free
for all. [Genesis, 16, 12] In Jewish tradition, [much before Arabic invasion
into Palestine], mentioned that the Jews will rule Palestine for 1300 years,
then the Arabs will rule it for 1300 years. This is more or less what did
take place. Jerusalem was sanctified for the Hebrews/Children of Israel, of
whom the Jews are remnants, because Lord Abraham was about to sacrifice his
son Issac to God. The place of the sacrifice was on the Temple Mountain,
were Solomon's Temple was built. Etzion
----- Original Message -----
From: <stevestubbs@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World HPB and the Nazi doctrines


> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, samblo@c... wrote:
> > One of the Biblical problems is
> > "collapsed time" in
> > rendition of history and chronological timelines.
>
> Yes, the exodus story includes the stories of two different legendary
> heroes, both of whom are presumed to have been named "Moses."
> Scholars derive this from the fact that the writer mentions volcanoes
> in the Sinai desert, whereas we know therenever have been volcanoes
> there. It therefore appears that the fellow who worshipped volcanoes
> was a different person from the one who led the Hebrews out if Egypt,
> and probably lived far to the north, where there is eviddence of
> volcanic activity in ancient times.
>
> If the Hyksos did as
> > he said then
> > neither the Hebrew or the Palistinians have original claim to
> Jerusalem
>
> I do not believe the Arabs invaded Palestine until the seventh
> century AD if memory serves me correctly, so they should not claim
> any historical priority. I think their claim is that they have lived
> there for 1200 years or so and that there is no reason why they
> should be expelled.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>