Clarification regarding BA G's previous post.
Dec 18, 2002 10:01 PM
by Bhakti Ananda Goswami " <bhakti.eohn@verizon.net>
DEAR THEOS-TALK READERS, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH IN
MY PREVIOUS POST IS MINE, NOT MR. JOHNSON'S. I APOLOGIZE TO MR.
JOHNSON AND YOU FOR THE ACCIDENTAL OMISSION OF THE > TO INDICATE THAT
THE PARAGRAPH WAS MINE AND NOT HIS.
Bhakti Ananda Goswami
>Controversy does not kill intellectual endeavors. It is the silent
treatment that consigns ideas to the unmarked potters-field of
history. If able, the operative knowledge-filter of a dominant
culture / thought system screens-out intolerable ideas by ignoring,
censuring or suppressing them. Ignoring them is the best option.
Humans are good at denial of their personal and collective character
defects, mistakes and sins. So when someone comes along to prick
them and challenge their conscience, denial and the knowledge-filter
come into play. You have experienced this denial as a reaction to
you book coming from Theosophists, but in India, your book is up
against a force of denial generated by a national sense of Aryan
historical identity and its veneration of HPB, Annie Besant and other
Theosophical leaders of Indian Nationalism. Your analysis of the
genealogy of Theosophical thought may be an uncomfortably too-close
and too-honest look at the origins of revered Annie Besant's
Society.
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application