Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00139)

Are you now implying that what ticked you off was that I was castigating 
Daniel? You must be Joking. Daniel has been the only one here who 
consistently was questioning the credibility and truthfulness of the one that 
I pointed out was viciously attacking theosophy, HPB and the Masters. In 
fact, Daniel and I have never had any disagreements, and I admire the work he 
has done and is doing for theosophy. 

Maybe you should reread the letter that triggered your crude remarks and 
comment about my being "vicious" -- as well as read the dialogues that Daniel 
and I had with Brian/Bridgitte over the past couple of years -- that got 
him/her banned from this site twice.

As for your posts, I have no complaint with them and even enjoy reading them 
when they make theosophical sense. However, I don't appreciate your "being 
in our face" with crude remarks based on loose cannon judgments about why and 
who I might be "pointing a finger" at. In any event, I don't think this 
"pointing of a finger" at your thoughtless remarks is too far out of line 
with reality. :-)

LHM



In a message dated 11/30/02 10:55:06 PM, netemara888@yahoo.com writes:

>You need not answer my question. But you have no problem castigating 
>Daniel Caldwell do you? He has helped keep Theosophy alive by his 
>research and work on The Blavatsky Archives. And you seem to be here 
>to tear him and his work down. I for one do not appreciate your 
>efforts along those lines. You need not prove to me you're vicious.
>
>Netemara
>
>As for not being in your face, don't read my posts. Besides you are 
>not the owner of this forum and have no business talking about who 
>should be excluded from it.