Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00025)

Dear Steve Stubbs,

I did post my index here for the members' easy referal. It is Message 
9953, Date: Fri Dec 27, 2002 2:30 am
Subject: BA G's BIO-ETHICS REPORT ON SEX DIFFERENTIATION

There is some introductory information and then a table of contents 
before the detailed topical index. 

I use only the very best of references in my work, so the information 
in my report is from the world's top experts and institutions. 

The report is NOT about the so-called psychology of sex, because it 
deals with the pure biology of sex differentiation and sex dimorphic 
behavior. The report is concerned with what is known about the purely 
physical causes and outcomes of reproductive health, related behavior 
and 'disorders' in vertebral animals and man. 

best wishes, 

BA G

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Stubbs <stevestubbs@y...>" 
<stevestubbs@y...> wrote:
> Deat BAG:
> 
> Many thanks for your interesting comments. Yes, psychiatrists 
> consider GID to be "non-specific aetiology," which means it exists, 
> but cannot be traced to any specific medical condition. Your 
> comments are very thought proboking indeed. I certainly agree with 
> you that religious and other groups need to stop sticking their 
noses 
> where they do not belong and distirting what should be a scientific 
> question.
> 
> You mention your "index", papers, and so on. Are they published or 
> on the Internet, or how does one refer to them? I susepct your 
> compl;ete paper answers a lot of other questions that have rolled 
iy 
> my mind since I took DSM IV classes.
> 
> Jung theorized that if you are consciously a male, your unconscious 
> mind is a female, and v.v. Whether he was right or not I cannot 
say, 
> but I can see how at least in theory if unconscious contents are 
> pressing into coonsciousness more easily than they do in "normal" 
> people (a condition one sees in both schizophrenics and seers) one 
> could have an alter ego which was of the opposite sex from one's 
> persona. It would not be surprising to see something like this in 
> someone who is perfectly sane but who nonetheless had easier than 
> normal intercommunication between the conscious and unconscious 
> minds, as someone like HPB would have had. (I am assuming she did 
> have psychic experiences as she says she did, and that the boundary 
> between these two autonomous psychic regions was therefore porous.)