Re: British Israelism and other "6e Race=US" type beliefs.
Nov 23, 2002 04:17 AM
Brian writes or posts: "Irrespective of whether this was interpreted
in Identity terms as the prophesied global reign of the anti-Christ,
or understood in more secular terms, the conclusion that white
Americans were to be subjugated was clear. Federal violence,
symbolized by the 1992 killing at Ruby Ridge and the burning flames
of Waco in 1993 left no doubt in believers' minds about what should
Comment: I was watching a Christian broadcast and on it there was a
Jewish author who had just published, had book published, in which he
provides evidence, hard evidence, that Prince Charles of England is
the anti-christ. He says that Charles can or does trace himself back
to King David. And you say that there is a bridge between the Jews of
England and the British that would almost make it sound like those
Brits who were sent here on the Mayflower or the pilgrims were mostly
Jews! And that would make of most Americans not only part Native
American, which runs through most of the population in the Americas,
but also part Jewish.
I know Bailey said that Jews are basically found everywhere, but is
that what you are implying here? As well as predicting the fall of
the Aryan man? The US is the only country in the world that has not
declared its majority's language as the official language i.e.
English. Or have I missed that somewhere, has this ever been declared
and put in writing that English is this country's official language.
If not then Spanish could very well be declared the official language
of America, and soon.
Finally Brian: If even 1/10th of what you posted has any basis in
truth, then it would seem that race would have to be an invention of
Satan, and not from God. Because it is here not to restore our faith
in the human race, but to destroy it by being blinded by it. Did God
intend us to be blinded by color? MLK said that we would become a
color blind society and that men would be judged by the content of
their character, and NOT the color of their skin. And that implies
that one has to have some damn character in the first place before
being judged. But being a Christian preacher he is still using words
like judgement and character and the like. So, even in his high-road
approach of what is to come he is still using words which indicate
that someone has to EARN their way into being loved, accepted,
wanted, and most of all SEEN. Not be the invisible man on the block.
Is MLK telling his own people they better straighten up or else? They
as well as others need some character to call their own in order to
be a part of the 'new order?' and in order to be acceptable and loved
as well. I don't see it the way MLK sees it, and I don't really
think 'God' sees it that way either. Energy is impersonal, what we do
with it makes us in the eyes of men -- angels or devils--white or
black, good or evil. These are the meanings we as a culture have
attributed to white: good, angelic...etc. So where do you suggest we
We are really all Latinos at heart. I know I am part Cuban.
[Back to Top]
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application