Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00331)

In a message dated 11/12/02 11:26:38 AM, brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com writes:

>But just like Leon Maurer who ofcourse claimed the messages from 
>Bhakti Anada Goswhami where a fake , he in turn couldn't answer any of
>the issues Bhakti Anada Goswhami brought up and now as a revenge is 
>posting fake claims about Einstein and a non-existing web site.

Ha, Ha. This is about as accurate as most of your other fantasies and 
opinionated remarks. When did I claim the messages from BAG were a fake? 
What issues did he (if he exists) bring up that I "couldn't answer"? And 
what fake claims about Einstein and a non existent web site did I make? Do 
these unfounded accusations make anyone believe that any of the other 
negative claims you make about HPB, theosophy and the Mahatma letters have 
any basis in facts? I think you have become so obsessed with your vendetta 
against theosophy and HPB that you will say anything, no matter how far from 
truth or reality to back up your imagined omniscience about matters concerni
ng theosophical history and proving the falsity of its teachings. Your black 
brush is painting much too wide a swath, and is beginning to make less and 
less sense to anyone who can THINK.

And, by the way, what makes BAG an "authority" on anything? 

LHM

--------Original Message-----------

In a message dated 11/12/02 11:26:38 AM, brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com writes:

>Theosophical Ars Inquisitor Daniel C. Caldwell: "who wrote the text ALL
>IN CAPS at the beginning of this posting?:
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8477
>
>Brian : I mentioned three times on this list that the letter was send to
>me by someone who was reading the postings on theos talk and writing 
>me privately about it. I posted clearly WHY the letters where typed in
>all caps, I decided to do the most fair I could think of , give this 
obviously
>expert person, a voice. Without compromising his the identity. This was
>not difficult to do since I agree on almost all counts whit what Bhakti
>Ananda wrote to me, in fact already 3 years ago during my private 
>correspondence with a Theosophist I respect, Steve Stubbs I kept 
>repeating the same question:
>
> "where is the information in the texts themselves that show they are 
>authentic, and are what they claim to be ?"
>
>But just like Leon Maurer who ofcourse claimed the messages from 
>Bhakti Anada Goswhami where a fake , he in turn couldn't answer any of
>the issues Bhakti Anada Goswhami brought up and now as a revenge is 
>posting fake claims about Einstein and a non-existing web site.
>
>Also Ars Inquisitor Daniel C. Caldwell showed not to be capable to 
>address ANY of the genuine issuis brought up by BAG. Meaning one must 
>conclude Daniel C. Caldwell must really know he is defending a cococted
>fake in case of The Mahatma letters. In any case since BAG has come 
>forward and identified himself, I have placed two of his letters 
>On-line:
>
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9/lettersed.html
>
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9/resp.html
>
> And pulling the all together in a few words one maybe can say:
>
>Does it ring a bell?
>
>Let us think:
>
>Philosophy (of the ancient Upanishats, Greeks).
>
>Theology (of medieval Church). 
>
>Theosophy (of the 19th century).
>
>It is chemistry time!
>
>Philosophy + Theology = Theosophy + ? 
>
>Guess what!
>