Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00243)

Hell, all one needs to do to understand the Ageless Wisdom is to be 
able to count to six! Now you do the math. As 3 and 4 come before 5 
and 6, then the 'inferior' races would have to be way older than 
the 'superior' races. Right? Right. And with that comes a round of 
greater karmas. IMO The earlier races are somehow suppressed NOW so 
that the newer, younger races might flourish. That is also the 
meaning of beauty. Beauty is in the eyes of the young....The only 
problem with suppression, even if temporary, that during that state 
of sleeping giant nap, the giant killers come out and do genocide on 
the race while it is sleeping. Thus the wheel grinds on.......

Netemara

PS: I think the superior part comes in that new models are always 
improved upon in some way. In that sense only can we apply the term 
superior to the Aryan race. What comes after has the benefit of what 
has gone before. It is hindsight is 20/20 sort of thing, nothing 
inherent at all about it. That noninherited, just happened on the 
scene already perfect and advanced is pie in the sky. It just did not 
happen. We are all connected in that sense, dependent on the progress 
of each other in order to progress ourselves. The masters and adepts 
of Atlantis did those feats not just for themselves but for 
posterity, what was left of it. 
***************



-- In theos-talk@y..., "Steve Stubbs" <stevestubbs@y...> wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@y..., "Frank Reitemeyer" <dhyana@w...> wrote:
> > Is Nietzsche's Superhuman racism?
> > Or is it racism to believe that all races and all men are EQUAL? 
> (Would that
> > be unjust to inferior or younger races?)
> > Is it childism to believe that children are inferior to the 
adults?
> > Is it sheepism to believe that sheep are different from wolves?
> 
> No, but I think you have identified a new form of political 
> incorrectness: FRANK-ISM.
> 
> Right or wrong, good or bad, the fact is that Blavatsky's 
nineteenth 
> century ideas about superior (white) and inferior (non-white) races 
> have not aged well over the past 125 years. I think we can agree 
on 
> that whether we take the modern or the nineteenth century side of 
the 
> argument.
> 
> If the theosophical theory is correct, it is not the "inferior" 
races 
> which are younger, but the "superior" races.