Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00090)

Hi Daniel and all of you,

A view among many:
Well, - Daniel - maybe you or other readers will find the following a little
annoying, but so what.

The Bailey connection:
But you, Daniel Caldwell, have NOT yet answered the questions in the
following email - dated november 3rd 2002 :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8405
And that email was a response to an even earlier email, where you Daniel
didn't respond.
This was the one - dated september 30th 2002:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8078

(Related links are for instance:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8132 and
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8126)

I will in a friendly and polite manner suggest, that Daniel Caldwell tries
to "move his own LAWN" first before
he teaches others to do so.
When do Daniel Caldwell answer on these questions in the above emails ?? And
links ??
Will it happen when a Mahatma Morya in sufi-dress comes flying out of the
thin air on one of the Mormons Golden Tablets ??

Do not misunderstand me - I can live without an answer on the above.
But, my point is: We can't demand others to answer our questions. It could
be, that our questions are
to be answered by not answering at all. No answer is also a response.
Silence talks !


And let us try to rethink this one:
My own assumptions are as good as anyone elses. That is true. Right ? >:-)
Laughs...

And to the anti-Theosophist readers I ask:
"Why do you refuse to seriously consider the possibility of developing
wisdom in your Brain ?"
"Are you too impatient or just stupid or what...?".

And thanks to Wry for this one emailed today, I quote Wry:
"As people, we are suggestible. There is a tendency to eternalize situations
and to want to believe this or that. There is a somewhat grave situation,
both politically and environmentally, on the planet earth, would you not
agree, but most people ARBITRARY believe they do not need to address this
problem "till tomorrow." Is this not true? I do this myself. You probably
do, too."

Yes. It seems that "Atlantis" is reincarnating and old ties of Racism has to
be dissolved.
One issue: A lot of Black americans in USA can't wote. Sometimes because
White policemen has thrown them to jail. It is mostly the Black americans
who are being jailed.
Another issue: Germany are against a war with Irak and USA etc...- they -
believe it or not - want - PEACE ! Great !
Analogy is a law in the universe. Maybe USA has to go through the similar
experience as Germany did in 1933-1946. Well maybe not...

I have a friend a master it is. A physical/non-physical one. I know they are
REAL.
Right human relations are of great importance. If our human relations during
the day are not proper - then we get exhausted or we feel not so well.

from
M. Sufilight flying with Morya on a Golden Tablet - with friendly
suggestions...and some young Rugrats with ESP...



----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel H. Caldwell" <comments@blavatskyarchives.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Theos-World "out of tin air" ?? etc.


> Brian/Brigitte wrote:
>
> "There are indeed many more believing Mormons then people believe
> the 'Mahatma Letters' have been created out of tin air, as Daniel
> Caldwell and Dallas/Dalval keep suggesting."
>
> B/B, exactly what do I keep suggesting? "out of tin air"???
>
> If I understand what you are trying to convey, I will simply say that
> my point of view appears to be very similar if not identical to Steve
> Stubbs' view. For example, he wrote:
>
> "The Shannon letter and the Gebhard letter are GOOD CANDIDATES for
> evidence that some letters were delivered by PHENOMENAL means."
> Quoted from: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8398
> caps added
>
> B/B, do you also contend that Steve believes that these two Mahatma
> Letters were "created out of tin air"?
>
> OBTW, how do you think the delivery of the Shannon letter was really
> accomplished? I'm sure Steve will be interested in your thinking
> about this. I know that I will be.
>
> See the Shannon letter at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8396
>
> I would also suggest that the following incidents indicate that
> additional letters or handwriting were created and/or delivered by
> phenomenal means:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8402
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8403
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8404
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8409
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8410
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8411
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8412
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8413
>
> I also see that you have so far refused to deal with the following
> email I posted:
>
> Brian/Brigitte on "valid" evidence about The Mahatma Letters
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/8367
>
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> BLAVATSKY ARCHIVES
> http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>