re to whoever . . .
Nov 06, 2002 04:32 AM
by Mauri
Yes, Brian, Paul, Brigitte, Dallas, Leon, etc., etc., it
seems obvious enough to me that certain kinds of
speculative, or "freer," approaches toward reality and
and the defining of reality can/might lead many people
into various complications, more or less directly or
indirectly. I suppose we all (or most of us?) try to cope,
clarify, improve, transcend, etc., in whatever ways that at
least seem . . . (what?) realistic, gratifying, relevant,
strategic, political, religious, or whatever . . . Of course if
we were all "relevant enough" in mainstream terms . . .
If life, in general, is seen in a certain kind of confined,
sanghic/communic sense, wouldn't that kind of confined
approach to life, (or to Theosophy?) tend to promote the
importance of equally confined mainstream values, at the
cost of freer thoughts, at times? One might wonder if
there's a current out there (that might have some kind of
Theosophic tinge to it, as well, say?) that might be
somewhat constitutionally ("consciously/less
consciously") against certain kinds of freer thoughts,
possibly seeing those as leading to such as black magic,
unfriendliness, alternativeness, lack of co-operation,
party pooping, confusion, problems, nonsense, etc, etc
Speculatively,
Mauri
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application