Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00031)

"Brian"/"Brigitte" write:

"Blavatsky claimed it was a 'Worldwide Brotherhood;' whoever wrote 
the Mahatma Letters apparently identified himself/herself with 
white 'Aryan' not even Indian. 'Mahatma K.H.' wrote to Sinnet in 
Colonial India: 'yourselves the white conquerors.'" 

"No Indian/'Thibetan'/or Oriental person in their right mind would 
write what these so called 'Mahatmas' wrote like 'The highest race 
(physical intellectuality) is the last sub-race of the fifth -- 
yourselves the white conquerors. The majority of mankind belongs to 
the seventh sub-race of the fourth Root race, -- the above mentioned 
Chinamen and their off-shoots and branchlets (Malayans, Mongolians, 
Tibetans, Javanese, etc., etc., etc.) and remnants of other sub-races 
of the fourth -- and the seventh sub-race of the third race. All 
these, fallen, degraded semblances of humanity.' (Letter No. 23b 
by 'Koot Hoomi')" Quoted from:
http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~muehleb9/austr.html

Can anyone make sense of the following statement?

". . . whoever wrote the Mahatma Letters apparently identified 
himself/herself with white 'Aryan' not even Indian."

What evidence is Brian/Brigitte basing this statement on? What 
relevance, if any, does KH's words "yourselves the white conquerors" 
have to Brian's/Brigitte's assertion that the writer of the 
MLS "identified himself/herself with white 'Aryan'...."?

I do not understand the reasoning behind such a statement? If anyone 
else does, please share your insights with us.

Steve, do you understand the reasoning in this statement by 
Brian/Brigitte?

Daniel