Theos-Talk Archives (November 2002 Message tt00007)

Hi Brian and all of you,

Please Brian could you be more specific when you refer to the
in the below mentioned Mahatma Letter of racism ??
What number is it ? What year is it from ? etc....

Please...

from
M. Sufilight with his book torn apart....>:-)


----- Original Message -----
From: "brianmuehlbach" <brianmuehlbach@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:49 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: The Mahatma Letters.


> Steve: it must be a matter of interest whether the mahatma
> letters are what they say they are or what you say they are.
>
> Brian: It would be nice in that case to see valid evidence letters are
> what they say they are. And what constitute valid evidence does not
> depends on me. At the moment there no evidence, it only depends on if
> you want to believe it or not.
>
> Steve: Kargyu lineage
>
> Brian: Can you show us any authentic document of the Kargyu lineage
> that states as its teacheings that "The highest race (physical
> intellectuality) is the last sub-race of the fifth -- yourselves
> the white conquerors. The majority of mankind
> belongs to the seventh sub-race of the fourth Root race, -- the above
> mentioned Chinamen and their off-shoots and branchlets (Malayans,
> Mongolians, Tibetans, Javanese, etc., etc., etc.) and remnants of other
> sub-races of the fourth -- and the seventh sub-race of the third race. All
> these, fallen, degraded semblances of humanity." (Mahatma K.H.) ?
>
>
Brian
>
> --- In theos-talk@y..., "Steve Stubbs" <stevestubbs@y...> wrote:
> > --- In theos-talk@y..., "brianmuehlbach" <brianmuehlbach@y...>
> wrote:
> > > Why burden ? If someone claims Elvis is alive and he lives on
> > > Mars with his a wife and 14 children, why "we" have the burden to
> > > establish whether this claim is true or not ?
> >
> > You only have to do so if it is a matter of interest. Since you post
> > so frequently, it must be a matter of interest whether the mahatma
> > letters are what they say they are or what you say they are.
> >
> > I
> > > don't see a major mystery in the fact that that some of the
> > letters, such
> > > as the Shannon letter, could not have been delivered other then by
> > > either HPB or Damodar.
> >
> > In her bio, even Marion Meade said the Shannon letter was a mystery.
> >
> > > Even Paul Johnson
> >
> > I respect him, but his beliefs do not constitute evidence of anything.
> >
> > > In fact Steve, no Indian/Thibetan/or Oriental person in their
> > right mind
> > > would write what these so called "Mahatmas" wrote like" "The
> > highest
> > > race (physical intellectuality) is the last sub-race of the fifth --
> > yourselves
> > > the white conquerors.
> >
> > "White" in India referred to the Bramin caste, which was believed to
> > be the ancestor of the British, a la the Aryan invasion and migration
> > theory.
> >
> > > So with "White" Brotherhood was clearly intended just that,
> > whoever
> > > wrote this clearly identified himself/herself with white "Aryan"
> > not even
> > > Indian.
> >
> > Not true. The "white" lineage of Tibet (Kargyu lineage) has nothing
> > to do with white skin an more than the Nyingma has to do with red
> > skin or the Gelugs has anything to do with yellow skin.
> >
> > Besides, Blavatsky never used the phrase "white brotherhood." That
> > was Mabel Collins who did tht. The term was popularized by
> > Leadbearter, who claimed to be hobnobbing with mahatmas on a
> moment
> > by moment basis, as well as doing all sorts of other improbable
> > things.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>