[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 22, 2002 00:49 AM
by leonmaurer
Point well taken. Thanks for the clarification. LHM In a message dated 10/21/02 11:09:50 PM, bartl@sprynet.com writes: >leonmaurer@aol.com wrote: >> What has all this political B.S. got to do with theosophy? I thought >> HPB said that politics, along with other "personal" and "opinionated" >> subjects, are "side issue" that should be left out of theosophical >> study or discussion. And, this is a forum specifically set up for >> theosophical discussion, isn't it? > > She said that the Theosophical Society should not get involved in >politics, but this does NOT extend to individual Theosophists, who are >expected to be active in areas designed to help the world. And politics >itself is a branch of philosophy, which makes discussion of it quite >valid as part of the 2nd Object. > > And, in spite of the ideas of far too many Theosophists, if people >would do evil, the wrong solution is to let them do their evil and hope >they'll go away. Inaction creates karma as much as action does. > > There currently is a major, insidious political philosophy which works >against Theosophical ideals while claiming to work towards them. It >promotes disunity and selfishness under the guise of unity and >selflessness. It is an anti-Theosophy, and just because it has political >influence does not mean that it is not the duty of Theosophists to work >against it.